Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hoyt, 304 N.W.2d 884.

56 citing documents.

Weidner Apartment Homes v. B. F. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Weidner Apartment Homes v. B. F. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating “[appellate courts] do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar.”) Weidner argues that it has standing to challenge the constitutionality of the entirety of subdivision 3(a).
In re the Custody of K.S. A. and G. M. A., Catherine Easter, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
First, “[courts] do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar.”
In re the Matter of: Nezha Boutlane, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[Courts] do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar.” State v. Hoyt
A17-1502 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Hoyt , (observing that courts do not decide constitutional issues where unnecessary to decide a case).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A claim of right includes “[e]xpress or implied consent—a license—to a person from one who has the authority to give such consent.”
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lowell Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lowell Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “[t]he claim of right is a defense only if it is bona fide.”
City of Duluth v. 120 East Superior Street, Duluth, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
City of Duluth v. 120 East Superior Street, Duluth, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
However, appellate courts “do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar.”
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
See *754 ("[Courts] do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar.").
In Re Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 748 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 748 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(“We do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar.”).
State v. Rodriguez 738 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Rodriguez 738 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Welfare of Children of N.F. 735 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Welfare of Children of N.F. 735 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(stating that constitutional questions should not be addressed unless necessary to dispose of a case).
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(holding that courts do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to dispose of a case).
In Re the Risk Level Determination of S.S. 726 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Risk Level Determination of S.S. 726 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(holding that courts do not decide constitutional questions unless issue is dispositive).
State v. Kuhlman 722 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Kuhlman 722 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(providing that courts do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to dispose of case).
State v. Carter 697 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 2005
State v. Carter 697 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 2005
(deferring the constitutional issue because conviction was reversed on other grounds); , 269 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).
Meyer v. Lindala 675 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Meyer v. Lindala 675 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Constitutional questions should not be decided unless doing so is necessary “to dispose of the case at bar.”
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating that “[w]e do not decide constitutional questions except when necessary to do so in order to dispose of the case at bar”); Minn. Baptist Convention v. Pillsbury Acad., 246 Minn. 46, 62 , (stating that “[u]nder well-settled rules the court refrains from deciding, wher
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(constitutional questions should not be decided unless doing so is necessary “to dispose of the case at bar”).
State v. Baumann 616 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Baumann 616 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Snilsberg v. Lake Washington Club 614 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Snilsberg v. Lake Washington Club 614 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(stating person visiting a tenant, resident, or occupier of land with express or implied consent is entrant rather than trespasser); Peterson v. Ba-lach, 294 Minn. 161, 174 , (stating possessor of land owes entrants duty of reasonable care).
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(nursing home resident held to be in possession of nursing home property); (tenant farmer in possession of land may sue owner for trespass).
State v. Occhino 572 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Occhino 572 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of Bloomington 499 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of Bloomington 499 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(constitutional questions decided only when necessary to dispose of case).
State v. Rein 477 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Rein 477 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(defendant may offer evidence that he has a property right such as owner, tenant, lessee, licensee or invitee); (statute may give person licensee status).
State v. Montano 437 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Montano 437 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See, (reversal of trespass conviction on other grounds made it unnecessary to decide constitutional challenge).
State v. Scholberg 395 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Scholberg 395 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1985