Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Auger v. Gillette Co., 303 N.W.2d 255.
- Sticha v. McDonald's No. 291 346 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
- Blau v. Masters Restaurant Associates, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Blau v. Masters Restaurant Associates, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Evenson v. Omnetic's 344 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Evenson v. Omnetic's
344 N.W.2d 881
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the Minnesota Supreme Court held, The test of whether activity constitutes misconduct for purposes of disqualification from unemployment compensation benefits is whether it is in willful disregard of an employer’s interest — the disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to exp
- King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez 341 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
-
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez
341 N.W.2d 294
Minn. Ct. App. 1983
modifies the Tilseth standard and demands an “objective” rather than a “subjective” test for determining misconduct.
- White v. Metropolitan Medical Center 332 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1983
- White v. Metropolitan Medical Center 332 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1983