Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Henning v. Wineman, 306 N.W.2d 550.

41 citing documents.

John Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 880 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re Approval of Settlement & Distribution of Wrongful Death Proceeds for the Next of Kin of Markuson 685 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Approval of Settlement & Distribution of Wrongful Death Proceeds for the Next of Kin of Markuson 685 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
The parties further agreed to submit a number of issues to the district court, only three of which are involved in this appeal: (1) what is the appropriate allocation “of the wrongful death settlements” between recoverable and nonrecoverable damages considering the trustees’ claim that “the settlements do not fully compensate” the families for their respective damages; (2) what is the present value of the future workers’ compensation
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Appellant Wausau Insurance Company challenges the district court’s order granting respondents’ arguing that as a matter of law respondents were required to allocate the judgment under the statutory formula in Minn.Stat.
Kliniski v. Southdale Manor, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1994
Kliniski v. Southdale Manor, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1994
we held that the trial court has the authority to allocate the proceeds of a settlement between amounts recoverable and not recoverable under the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Hewitt v. Apollo Group 490 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hewitt v. Apollo Group 490 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Folstad v. Eder 467 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1991
Folstad v. Eder 467 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1991
If the injured employee has a spouse with a loss of consortium claim, the employee may elect to have an appropriate portion of the overall settlement set aside in satisfaction of the consortium claim, leaving only the remaining portion of the settlement subject to the subdivision 6 formula
Keenan v. Hydra-Mac, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Keenan v. Hydra-Mac, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Locher v. Gareis 411 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Locher v. Gareis 411 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ruddy v. Ford Motor Co. 399 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ruddy v. Ford Motor Co. 399 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Morrison v. Kurak 394 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Morrison v. Kurak 394 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight System 384 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight System 384 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Minnesota the district courts have subject matter jurisdiction to allocate the proceeds of a third-party settlement between amounts recoverable and nonrecoverable under the worker’s compensation act, and to allocate the proceeds under the statutory formula provided in § 176.061, subd.
Staats v. Fabricating Equipment & Systems, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Staats v. Fabricating Equipment & Systems, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the supreme court held district courts have jurisdiction to allocate a recovery between recoverable and non-recoverable damages even though the Worker’s Compensation Division may also have allocation jurisdiction.
Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co. 353 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1984
Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co. 353 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1984
Krause v. Merickel 344 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1984
Krause v. Merickel 344 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1984
Sargent v. Johnson 323 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1982
Sargent v. Johnson 323 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1982
Metropolitan Transit Commission v. Bachman's 311 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1981
Metropolitan Transit Commission v. Bachman's 311 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1981
Aetna Life & Casualty, Casualty & Surety Division v. Anderson 310 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1981
Aetna Life & Casualty, Casualty & Surety Division v. Anderson 310 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1981
Sargent v. Preston-Haglin Construction Co. 304 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1981
Sargent v. Preston-Haglin Construction Co. 304 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1981