Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, 311 N.W.2d 497.

76 citing documents.

Russell v. Special School District No. 6 366 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, , 499 n. 2 (Minn.1981); Schmidt v. Independent School District *706 No. 1, -68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
overturn the Board’s decision to terminate Strand when the decision was “fraudulent, arbitrary, unreasonable, not supported by substantial evidence on the record, not within the school board’s jurisdiction, or is based on an erroneous theory of law.” Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, ).
Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1 365 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1 365 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
rn the district’s decision to terminate the teachers if the decision was “fraudulent, arbitrary, unreasonable, not supported by substantial evidence on the record, not within the school board’s jurisdiction, or is based on an erroneous theory of law.” Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, ).
Miller v. City of Saint Paul 363 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fisher v. Independent School District No. 622 357 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fisher v. Independent School District No. 622 357 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pearson v. School Board of Independent School District No. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pearson v. SCH. BD. OF IND. SCH. DIST. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pearson v. School Board of Independent School District No. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, , 499 n. 2 (Minn.1981)).
Pearson v. SCH. BD. OF IND. SCH. DIST. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
1984) (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, , 499 n. 2 (Minn.1981)).
Atwood v. Independent School District No. 51, Foley 354 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1984
Atwood v. Independent School District No. 51, Foley 354 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1984
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 353 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ostlund v. Independent School District No. 47, Sauk Rapids 354 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 353 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 11, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832
Ostlund v. Independent School District No. 47, Sauk Rapids 354 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin 349 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin 349 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peck v. Independent School District No. 16 348 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peck v. Independent School District No. 16 348 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 832, Kroll v. Independent School Dist.
State Ex Rel. Dreyer v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 542 344 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1984
State Ex Rel. Dreyer v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 542 344 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1984
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 325 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1982
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 325 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1982
On appeal to this court, a school board’s decision to terminate a teacher will be set aside only if the decision is “fraudulent, arbitrary, unreasonable, not supported by substantial evidence on the record, not within the school board’s jurisdiction, or is based on an erroneous theory of law.” Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, (citations omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by