Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Salas, 306 N.W.2d 832.

63 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 832, 835 (Minn. 1981).
State of Minnesota v. Marco Anthony Gresham Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marco Anthony Gresham Minn. Ct. App. 2016
For example, in State v. Salas, the defendant challenged the admission of “testimony that showed defendant thought the victim was accusing him of having committed a prior crime.”
State v. Lee 645 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 2002
State v. Lee 645 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 2002
State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Vick 632 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2001
State v. Vick 632 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2001
The record is not clear as to whether the trial court admitted the Lake County over-the-clothes evidence as other-crimes Spreigl evidence or as "relationship evidence.” (noting that where evidence bears directly on the history of the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the state is not required to follow the Spreigl rule as a condition of getting the evidence admitted).
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
“[E]x-posure of some jurors to news reports before trial does not mean that the jury was biased.”
State v. Reckinger 603 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Thompson, 266 Minn. 385, 388 , (“The vice of the publicity given this case is not in printing or disseminating factual news but in printing and broadcasting what purports to be the opinions of people who are supposed to know the facts.”).
State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
State v. Walen 563 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1997
State v. Walen 563 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1997
State v. Zanter 518 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Zanter 518 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
The trial court ruled that the acts of harassment and the computer manual retrieval were admissible, (motive, relationship), but subject to reexamination under Minn.R.Evid.
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
22, 1987) (-37 (Minn. 1981); State v. Martin, 293 Minn. 116, 128-29 , -27 (1972)).
State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
See Boyce, 284 Minn. at 254-58 , d at 112-14 ; -38 (Minn.1981) (jury justified in finding person of ordinary self-control would not have been provoked).
State v. Gurske 424 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Gurske 424 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(evidence did not compel a manslaughter verdict, because no weapon was found on the victim, defendant did not testify he produced one, and defendant fired a second shot into the victim and beat him).
State v. Williams 418 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1988
State v. Williams 418 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1988
State v. Alladin 408 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Alladin 408 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Roy 408 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Lindberg 408 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Roy 408 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-37 (Minn.1981); State v. Martin, 293 Minn. 116, 128-29 , -27 (1972).
State v. Lindberg 408 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Gustafson 396 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Gustafson 396 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Richardson 393 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1986
State v. Richardson 393 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1986
This court faced a where the defendant, convicted of first-degree murder, argued that the victim’s action of reaching into his shirt as if for a gun provoked the fear that caused him to shoot.
State v. Stahlberg 373 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Stahlberg 373 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
State v. King 367 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1985