Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Arbitration Between Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Emp…, 309 N.W.2d 785.

56 citing documents.

Afscme Dist. Coun. 96 v. Ind. Sch. Dist. 381 351 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Recently this section was interpreted by Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, which reinstated an arbitrator's award based on the past practice of the parties that was in conflict with the clear and unambiguous language of the parties' written agreement.
In re Arbitration between AFSCME District Council 96 & Independent School District No. 381, Two Harbors 351 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
§ 572.19(1)(3) (1982) which permits a court to vacate an arbitration award when “the arbitrators exceeded their powers.” Recently this section was interpreted by Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, which reinstated an arbitrator’s award based on the past practice of the parties that was in conflict with the clear and unambiguous language of the parties’ written agreement.
Eisen v. State, Department of Public Welfare 352 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1984
Eisen v. State, Department of Public Welfare 352 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1984
See Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8
Helmerichs v. Bank of Minneapolis & Trust Co. 349 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Helmerichs v. Bank of Minneapolis & Trust Co. 349 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
As the Supreme Court said in Ramsey County v. AFSCME, Council 91, Local 8, : The Uniform Arbitration Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 572.08 -.30 (1980) governs the authority and procedure for judicial interference with the arbitration process under either a private sector or public sector collective bargaining agreement con *328 taining an arbitration clause unless otherwise provided in the a