Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 309 N.W.2d 305.

39 citing documents.

Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corp. 834 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corp. 834 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Co., ), review denied (Minn. Feb.
McGlothlin v. Steinmetz 751 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 2008
McGlothlin v. Steinmetz 751 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 2008
Co., -10 (Minn.1981) (upholding district court’s finding that daughter was a resident in stepfather’s household because she was not self-supporting, had lived in the home for 2 months, had no specific plans to leave the home, and was 19 years old at the time of the accident); Pederson v. All Nation Ins.
Wolfer v. Microboards Manufacturing, LLC 654 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Wolfer v. Microboards Manufacturing, LLC 654 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (holding that a party is not estopped from challenging the arbitrability of an issue).
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 611 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 611 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., ap *360 proved the district court’s grant of de novo review of the issue of a party’s residency as a factual precondition to insurance coverage.
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Wood v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 415 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wood v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 415 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Fruchtman, 274 Minn. 54 , ; Firemen’s
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver 741 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Olson 402 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Olson 402 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
27, 1986); see also Fireman’s , 706 & n. 1 (Minn.1982)
Koranda v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Koranda v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 303 Minn. 473, 483-84 , ); Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284, 291 , -77 (1963).
Safeco Insurance Companies v. Diaz 385 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Safeco Insurance Companies v. Diaz 385 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Harris Ex Rel. Harris 374 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Harris Ex Rel. Harris 374 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Fruchtman a 27-year-old self-supporting son who visited his parents for a few weeks between military assignments was held not to be residing in their household; a 19-year-old dependent daughter staying at her parents’ home for two months was held to be a resident of their household; and in Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark, a 24-year-old son staying in his parents’ home for four months during a labor strike
French v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
French v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the injured party had moved in with her mother and stepfather, although her stay was understood to be of limited duration while she looked for a job and a place to live.
Ballanger v. Toenjes 362 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ballanger v. Toenjes 362 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 303 Minn. 473
Spira v. American Standard Insurance Co. 361 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Spira v. American Standard Insurance Co. 361 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 346 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1984
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 346 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1984
insurance policy will be issued to the owner of that car as the named insured, there would seem to be little difference between the two definitions of “relative.” We do not, however, write on a clean slate, since we have discussed this question in two prior cases
Woog v. Home Mutual Indemnity Co. 340 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1983
Woog v. Home Mutual Indemnity Co. 340 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1983
See Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 303 Minn. 473, 482
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 336 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1983
Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 336 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1983
See Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 303 Minn. 473, 482
Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. Viktora 318 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1982
Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. Viktora 318 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1982
While Fruchtman’s 2-week visit did not constitute a duration reflecting residency in the same household as his mother, a case decided after the district court’s decision in this case, we found that 2 months constituted sufficient duration to find a returning stepchild to be a resident of her mother and stepfather’s household.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by