Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Palm, 299 N.W.2d 740.

27 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
(affirming conviction when victim immediately recognized her attacker as former tenant of apartment building); (holding that identification of defendant was sufficient when victim instantly recognized defendant as someone she had seen numerous times in small town).
State v. Ronnebaum 446 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Kelly 435 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1989
State v. Kelly 435 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1989
this court set forth a standard for determining the admissahility of in-home, pre-ar-rest statements.
State v. Martinson 422 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Martinson 422 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Spencer 414 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Spencer 414 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Herem 384 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1986
State v. Herem 384 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1986
State v. Herem 371 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Herem 371 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The test for determining the need for a Miranda warning “is not whether the interrogation has coercive aspects to it or whether the investigation has focused on the person being questioned, but whether the person being questioned is in custody or is deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
Steinberg v. State, Department of Public Safety 357 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Steinberg v. State, Department of Public Safety 357 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
at 1612 ; United States v. Dobbs, 711 F.2d 84, 86 (8th Cir.1983)
State v. Perkins 353 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1984
State v. Perkins 353 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1984
City of Burnsville v. Marsyla 349 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1984
City of Burnsville v. Marsyla 349 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1984
711 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977), and with a number of decisions of this court
State v. Larson 346 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Larson 346 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Minnesota Supreme Court cases upholding Miranda-free at-home interrogations of suspects not in custody include: and State v. Ousley, 312 Minn. 546
State v. Makela 309 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1981
State v. Makela 309 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1981
State v. Horton 303 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1981
State v. Horton 303 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1981