Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Romain v. Pebble Creek Partners, 310 N.W.2d 118.

39 citing documents.

Capacity Wireless, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Robert F. Goerdt, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And the cases that appel lants cite are inapplicable, , 543 (Minn. 1979), regards an option contract used as a “memorandum of a contract of sale of real estate,” which is not present here as the option makes clear that the parties must separate ly negotiate a purchase agreement; addressed the applicability of the notice -cancellation statute to a purchase agreement and did not involve an option contract.
Streambend Properties II, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This rule, known as the Olson rule, “applies to cancelled purchase agreements.” 25 Eileen M. Roberts, Minnesota Practice, § 6.21 (2018-2019 ed. 2018); d 118, 122 –23 (Minn. 1981) (holding that finality of statutory cancellation applies to purchase agreements except where purchase agreement was not finally binding on both parties in all its essential terms; agreement was nullified pursuant to its own terms because parties failed to reach agreement on security for note
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(), review denied (Minn. May 15,1992).
Kellar v. Von Holtum 605 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2000
Kellar v. Von Holtum 605 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2000
Kellar v. Von Holtum 583 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Kellar v. Von Holtum 583 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
As the supreme court has noted, “The [district court] judge is familiar with the needs of the case, its importance and the strategies involved.”
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
See Monison, 274 Minn, at 137-38, d at 647
Jones v. Amoco Oil Co. 483 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Jones v. Amoco Oil Co. 483 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(citations omitted) (procedures of section 559.21 not required where purchase agreement was not finally binding on both parties in all its essential terms: agreement was nullified pursuant to its own terms because the parties failed to reach agreement on security for a note, which was a contingency fo
Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co. 473 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co. 473 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Peller v. Harris 464 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Peller v. Harris 464 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hollywood Dairy, Inc. v. Timmer 411 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hollywood Dairy, Inc. v. Timmer 411 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
2 (1982), which provides for cancellations, covers all contracts “for the conveyance of real estate or any interest therein executed on or after May 1, 1980.” to be “broad enough and plain enough to include purchase agreements.” However, the purchase agreement must be akin to a contract; “[t]his means a contract where both parties are bound by its terms.” Id.
Tran v. Estate of Ditzler 411 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tran v. Estate of Ditzler 411 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
3, 4(a); (the statutory language “is broad enough and plain enough to include purchase agreements”).
Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hill’s : The burden is on the prevailing party to show both that the depositions and copies were necessary to the conduct of the litigation and that they were effectively and pertinently used by the prevailing party.
Patterson v. Stover 400 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Patterson v. Stover 400 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northfield National Bank v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 390 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Northfield National Bank v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 390 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tchida v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 375 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Tchida v. Police Officers' Federation of Minneapolis 375 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The trial court allowed only the following items: Statutory costs $ 10.00 Clerk’s filing fee 30.00 Depositions of Tchida and Seliski 199.04 Deposition of Gehan 26.85 Deposition of Redman 20.69 Second deposition of Tchida 208.95 The trial court “is in the best position to judge what is truly necessary and what is only useful.”
Anderson v. Honaker 365 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Anderson v. Honaker 365 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the trial court determined respondent was entitled to recover the cost of videotaping the depositions of the three witnesses in addition to recovering the actual deposition transcript costs.
Reichert v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co. 360 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Reichert v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co. 360 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc. 355 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc. 355 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. State 347 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1984
Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. State 347 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1984
Striebel v. Minnesota State High School League 321 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Striebel v. Minnesota State High School League 321 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by