Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Woida v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co., 306 N.W.2d 570.
- James A. Hoffman, M.D., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Meyer 768 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Meyer
768 N.W.2d 399
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Co., (shooting at an occupied truck with a high-powered rifle); Continental W. Ins.
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schwich 749 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schwich
749 N.W.2d 108
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., (shooting at an occupied truck with a high-powered rifle); Iowa Kemper Ins.
- B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
- B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
- Miklas v. Parrott 663 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
- American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Neises 598 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Neises
598 N.W.2d 709
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (intent inferred from insured’s shooting of armor-piercing bullets at truck he knew was occupied); Continental W. Ins.
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1997
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1997
- German Mutual Insuurance Co. v. Yeager 554 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- German Mutual Insuurance Co. v. Yeager 554 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.
543 N.W.2d 418
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (intent inferred where insured fired gun at occupied truck); Iowa Kemper Ins.
- Rw v. Tf 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
- R.W. v. T.F. 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
- Rw v. Tf 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
- R.W. v. T.F. 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
- Haarstad v. Graff 517 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1994
-
Haarstad v. Graff
517 N.W.2d 582
Minn. 1994
State Farm, contends that it properly investigated the complaint, took Graffs statement, and determined there was no coverage because Graff intentionally assaulted and battered Haarstad.
- Rw v. Tf 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Rw v. Tf 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- R.W. v. T.F. 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- R.W. v. T.F. 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Haarstad v. Graff 506 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Haarstad v. Graff 506 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Donovan v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 493 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Donovan v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 493 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G. 484 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G. 484 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- McIntosh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 474 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- McIntosh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 474 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 474 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka
474 N.W.2d 324
Minn. 1991
Co., see 11 Couch on Insurance 2d § 44:289 at 449-50 (rev. ed. 1982).
- Petersen v. Croft 447 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Petersen v. Croft
447 N.W.2d 903
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
17, 1986), this court adopted a four-part test to determine whether an act is intentional
- Hink v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. 402 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hink v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. 402 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Clemens v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 378 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Clemens v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
378 N.W.2d 68
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Intent to injure for the purposes of determining insurance coverage “may be established by actual proof of an intent to injure or by showing that the character or nature of the act is such that intent can be inferred as a matter of law.” (
- Eastern Aviation & Marine Underwriters, Inc. v. Gilbertson 379 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Eastern Aviation & Marine Underwriters, Inc. v. Gilbertson
379 N.W.2d 567
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Woida *571 v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co.
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Smith
376 N.W.2d 506
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(en banc) (citations omitted); Caspersen v. Webber, 298 Minn. 93, 99