Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ploog v. Ogilvie, 309 N.W.2d 49.
- Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Co. 632 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 2001
-
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Co.
632 N.W.2d 560
Minn. 2001
Tolbert, d at 366 -68 & n. 11; (“A cotortfeasor who is causally negligent may not recover indemnity from another cotortfeasor.”).
- State ex rel. Kirkendoll v. Zacharias 410 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State ex rel. Kirkendoll v. Zacharias
410 N.W.2d 56
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(where evidence is documentary, appellate court need not defer to trial court’s assessment of it).
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Matter of Guardianship of Huesman 381 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Matter of Guardianship of Huesman 381 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright 359 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright
359 N.W.2d 647
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“Where the critical evidence is documentary, there is no need for us to defer to the trial court’s assessment of its meaning.”
- State v. Powell 357 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Powell
357 N.W.2d 146
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing In re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, 308 Minn. 221, 225-26 , , cert.
- Letourneau v. Letourneau 350 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Letourneau v. Letourneau
350 N.W.2d 476
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
However, “[w]hen the trial court relies solely on documentary evidence, a reviewing court accords no deference to the trial court’s assessment of the meaning of that evidence.” ().
- Shepard v. Shepard 352 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Shepard v. Shepard
352 N.W.2d 42
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court has stated that “[wjhere the critical evidence is documentary, there is no need for us to defer to the trial court’s assessment of its meaning.” (citing In re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, 308 Minn. 221 , ); at 363 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
- Marriage of Halper v. Halper 348 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Marriage of Halper v. Halper
348 N.W.2d 360
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court has stated, however, that “[w]here the critical evidence is documentary, there is no need for us to defer to the trial court’s assessment of its meaning.” (citing In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, 308 Minn. 221, 225-26 , , cert.
- Matter of Florance 343 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Matter of Florance 343 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
- Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983