Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., 314 N.W.2d 226.

63 citing documents.

C. W., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
27, 2013); see Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., - 29 (Minn. 1982) (holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion to amend to add a punitive -damages claim where punitive damages could not be awarded as a matter of law).
Jensen v. Walsh 623 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 2001
Jensen v. Walsh 623 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 2001
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., -29 (Minn.1982).
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The supreme court cited Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., for the proposition that punitive damages are not recoverable in a strict products-liability action where the plaintiff suffers only property damage.
Deal v. Northwood Children's Home Society, Inc. 608 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Deal v. Northwood Children's Home Society, Inc. 608 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In support of this argument, appellant cites Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., in which the supreme court reluctantly held that punitive damages were unavailable under the version of the wrongful death statute then in existence.
Mauer v. Kircher 587 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Mauer v. Kircher 587 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., see Minn. R. Civ.
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal, (noting the “extraordinary measure of deterrence” of punitive damages in strict liability cases).
Anderson v. Minnesota Ins. Guar. Ass'n 534 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1995
Anderson v. Minnesota Ins. Guar. Ass'n 534 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1995
See Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
On appeal to the supreme court, citing Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., -29 (Minn.1982), the manufacturer argued that punitive damages cannot be awarded in the absence of personal injury.
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., -29 (Minn.1982) (affirming denial to amend where damages could not be recovered under amended complaint).
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 511 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1994
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 511 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1994
In Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., we held that punitive damages could not be recovered in a strict products liability action where the plaintiff only suffers property damage.
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Keene argues punitive damages cannot be awarded in the absence of personal injury citing Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See *272 Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., (footnote omitted).
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Muehlstedt v. City of Lino Lakes 473 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., addressed the nature of punitive damages: [T]he “punitive damages remedy concerns the vital state interest of protecting persons against personal injury.” The interests implicated in strict liability actions for injury solely to property are not so great as to warrant extension of this controversial
Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. Tifco, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. Tifco, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(citing Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., ).
Hunt v. University of Minnesota 465 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hunt v. University of Minnesota 465 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., -29 (Minn.1982).
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen 454 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1990
Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen 454 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1990
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Gunnufson v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Gunnufson v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Nhep v. Roisen 446 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Nhep v. Roisen 446 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See also Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Cybyske v. Independent School District No. 196, (Party/wife did not have standing to raise claim of nonparty/husband); Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing, Etc., (Motion to allow recovery of punitive damages in strict products liability case denied because strict products liability theory of recovery does not support such a recovery).
Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.
Wurm v. John Deere Leasing Co. 405 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wurm v. John Deere Leasing Co. 405 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal
Envall v. Independent School District No. 704 399 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Envall v. Independent School District No. 704 399 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
DeRogatis Ex Rel. DeRogatis v. Mayo Clinic 390 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1986
DeRogatis Ex Rel. DeRogatis v. Mayo Clinic 390 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1986
§ 573.02 is detailed in Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 350-52 , -58 (1961), cited in Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet-Metal Co., , 228 n. 2 (Minn.1982).
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by