Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. Chilson, 306 N.W.2d 893.

36 citing documents.

Curtis Trude, (A15-0378), (A15-1863, A15-1864), Glenwood State Bank, counterclaimant, and third party v. Peterson Earth Movers, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Curtis Trude, (A15-0378), (A15-1863, A15-1864), Glenwood State Bank, counterclaimant, and third party v. Peterson Earth Movers, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
West Concord Conservation Club, n.3 (Minn. 1981).
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ass’n, d 706, 709 (Minn. 1995); cf. W. Concord Conservation Club, d 893, 896 (Minn. 1981) (“Negligence by the party invoking [estoppel] may deprive him of its protection.” (quotation omitted)).
Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
A “party attempting to invoke the doctrine [of equitable estoppel] cannot be negligent and cannot have knowledge of the defect in the title.” W. Concord Conservation Club
Gresser v. Hotzler 604 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gresser v. Hotzler 604 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
And apparent authority must be founded on the principal’s actions “since no agent by his own act can create evidence of authority.” West Concord Conservation Club, see also Hagedorn v. Aid Ass’n for Lutherans, 297 Minn. 253, 258
Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co. 563 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co. 563 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See West Concord Conservation Club, -98 (Minn.1981).
Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Yet “every person who undertakes to deal with an agent is put on inquiry and must discover whether the agent has the authority to complete the proposed act.” West Concord Conservation Club
Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc. 454 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc. 454 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
“To satisfy [the second prong] of the test, ‘proof of strict common law fraud is not required, but, rather, evidence that the corporate entity has been operated as a constructive fraud or in an unjust manner must be presented.’ ” ( , 898 n. 3 (Minn.1981)).
Foley v. Allard 427 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1988
Foley v. Allard 427 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1988
Furthermore, we determined that “[e]very person who undertakes to deal with an agent is put on inquiry * * * ” Truck Crane, d at 827 (quoting West Concord Conservation Club, ).
Schneider v. Buckman 412 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schneider v. Buckman 412 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
West Concord Conservation Club
Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. Swenson 414 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. Swenson 414 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See West Concord Conservation Club, (estoppel can be invoked only by the innocent; the truth must not be known to him when he acted; the conduct must have been relied upon by the party misled).
Miller & Schroeder, Inc. v. Gearman 413 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Miller & Schroeder, Inc. v. Gearman 413 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Usually, this means that the corporation “has been operated as a constructive fraud or in an unjust manner.” West Concord Conservation Club, , 898 n. 3 (Minn.1981).
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co. 400 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co. 400 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finally, apparent authority must be founded on the principal’s actions, not those of the agent, “since no agent by his own act can create evidence of authority * * West Concord Conservation Club
Cooney v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cooney v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See West Concord Conservation Club
Otto v. Weber 379 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Otto v. Weber 379 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See West Concord Conservation Club, , 898 n. 3 (Minn.1981).
Paynesville Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Ever Ready Oil Co. 379 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paynesville Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Ever Ready Oil Co. 379 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
West Concord Conservation Club, , 898 n. 3 (Minn.1981).
Grandnorthern, Inc. v. West Mall Partnership 359 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Grandnorthern, Inc. v. West Mall Partnership 359 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Possession serves “as notice to a purchaser of whatever rights the possessor has that would be discoverable upon reasonable inquiry.”
Truck Crane Service Co. v. Barr-Nelson, Inc. 329 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1983
Truck Crane Service Co. v. Barr-Nelson, Inc. 329 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1983
“Every person who undertakes to deal with an agent is put on inquiry and must discover whether the agent has the authority to complete the proposed act.”
White v. Jorgenson 322 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1982
White v. Jorgenson 322 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1982

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by