Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 307 N.W.2d 772.

30 citing documents.

Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Co. , , 775 (Minn. 1981) ("It is not for us to rewrite a statute that has no ambiguities...."
In re the Welfare of R.S. 805 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2011
In re the Welfare of R.S. 805 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2011
Co., (holding that in the absence of any ambiguity in the express language of a statute, resort to extrinsic aids to determine legislative intent is unnecessary and improper).
Reiter v. Kiffmeyer 721 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 2006
Reiter v. Kiffmeyer 721 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 2006
Braginsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 624 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Braginsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 624 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., (quoting Minn.Stat.
Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co. 577 N.W.2d 927 Minn. 1998
Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co. 577 N.W.2d 927 Minn. 1998
Bjorke v. Mayo Clinic of Rochester 574 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Bjorke v. Mayo Clinic of Rochester 574 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lombardo v. Seydow-Weber 529 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lombardo v. Seydow-Weber 529 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
First Trust Co. v. Leibman 430 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
First Trust Co. v. Leibman 430 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Feick v. State Farm Mutual Auto *260 mobile Insurance Co., see also Christopherson v. Federal Land Bank of St.
Christopherson v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul 388 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1986
Christopherson v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul 388 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1986
Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1985
Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1985
This issue must also be viewed in light of two other decisions by this court
Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
supports our determination.
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski 347 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski 347 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., a case which was decided after Minnesota Mutual paid benefits to Rudzinski but before the trial judge’s determination, the court concluded that Minn.Stat.