Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite First National Bank of St. Paul v. Ramier, 311 N.W.2d 502.

89 citing documents.

Schumacher v. Schumacher 627 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Estate of Palmen 588 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1999
In Re Estate of Palmen 588 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1999
Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1996
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1996
“[Ujnjust enrichment claims do not lie simply because one party benefits from the efforts or obligations of others, but instead it must be shown that a party was unjustly enriched in the sense that the term ‘unjustly’ could mean illegally or unlawfully.” First Nat’l
First National Bank of Glencoe/Minnetonka v. Pletsch 543 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
First National Bank of Glencoe/Minnetonka v. Pletsch 543 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Iverson v. Fjoslien, 298 Minn. 168
Trondson v. Janikula 458 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1990
Trondson v. Janikula 458 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1990
Gagne v. Hoban, 280 Minn. 475, 479 , -900 (1968) (in spite of the absence in instruments of an express loan, transaction found to be a mortgage based on all circumstances); cf. First Nat’l -04 (Minn.1981) (rule recognized); (rule recognized, used the terms equitable lien and equitable mortgage interchangeably).
Holman v. CPT CORP. 457 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Holman v. CPT CORP. 457 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc. 454 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc. 454 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Trondson v. Janikula 446 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Trondson v. Janikula 446 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-04 (Minn.1981) (an equitable mortgage is created when the parties intend a security transaction; when record discloses no indication a secured obligation was intended, an equitable lien is “wholly inappropriate”).
TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. v. Loft Homes, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. v. Loft Homes, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
relied in part on Sheasgreen to deny relief based on unjust enrichment, Ramier involved a purported constructive trust.
Hesselgrave v. Harrison 435 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hesselgrave v. Harrison 435 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Christle v. Marberg 421 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thompson Plumbing Co. v. J.E.C., Inc. 422 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Christle v. Marberg 421 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thompson Plumbing Co. v. J.E.C., Inc. 422 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Skjod v. Hofstede 402 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Skjod v. Hofstede 402 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(“unjust enrichment claims do not lie simply because one party benefits from the efforts or obligations of others, but instead it must be shown that a *841 party was unjustly enriched in the sense that the term ‘unjustly’ could mean illegally or unlawfully”).
Lynn Beechler Realty Co. v. Warnygora 396 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lynn Beechler Realty Co. v. Warnygora 396 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Galante v. Oz, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Galante v. Oz, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Weber Ex Rel. Sanft v. Goetzke 371 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Weber Ex Rel. Sanft v. Goetzke 371 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Estate of Vangen 370 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Estate of Vangen 370 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Wicker v. Roering 364 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Wicker v. Roering 364 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985