Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Walker, 310 N.W.2d 89.

59 citing documents.

State v. Schantzen 316 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1982
State v. Weibel 314 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1982
State v. Weibel 314 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1982
we said: Although it is commonly stated that uncorroborated eyewitness identification testimony of a-single witness is sufficient to support a guilty verdict, we have recognized that not all single eyewitness cases are the same and have emphasized that when the single witness’ identification of a defe
State v. Esmailzadeh 312 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1981
State v. Esmailzadeh 312 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1981
that not all single eyewitness identification cases are the same, and we emphasized that when the single witness’ identification of a defendant is made after only limited observation, corroboration is required if we are to sustain the conviction.
State v. Almengor 310 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1981
State v. Almengor 310 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1981
State v. Hinkle 310 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1981
State v. Hinkle 310 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1981