Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc., 326 N.W.2d 149.

113 citing documents.

Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hud v. Snyder Body, Inc.
Lawin v. City of Long Prairie 355 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lawin v. City of Long Prairie 355 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.
ACLI International Commodity Services, Inc. v. Lindwall 347 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ACLI International Commodity Services, Inc. v. Lindwall 347 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Casimir of Wells, 243 Minn. 289, 292 , (quoted in Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.
Rients v. International Harvester Co. 346 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rients v. International Harvester Co. 346 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bilotta v. Kelly Co., Inc., — N.W.2d — at n. 3 (Minn. March 16, 1984) (strict liability); Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc., (negligence); Farr v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 288 Minn. 83 , (breach of warranty).
Wohlfeil v. Murray MacHinery, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wohlfeil v. Murray MacHinery, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
It is well established that an “expert must base his opinion 'on facts sufficient to form an adequate foundation for an opinion and should not be allowed to *875 speculate.” -55 (Minn.1982) (quoting Albert Lea Ice & Fuel Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co., 239 Minn. 198, 202 , ).
Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Orbeth, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1984
Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Orbeth, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1984
Nor did the recent extension of the Lambertson principle in Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc., alter the basic requirement of common liability.