Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-Petersen, 310 N.W.2d 471.

194 citing documents.

Marriage of Ross v. Ross 477 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Ross v. Ross 477 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Harkema v. Harkema 474 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Harkema v. Harkema 474 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Geiger v. Geiger 470 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Geiger v. Geiger 470 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Auge, d at 399 (); see Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Baum v. Baum 465 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Baum v. Baum 465 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Westphal v. Westphal 457 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Westphal v. Westphal 457 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
a trial court should not hold an evidentiary hearing in a custody modification proceeding unless the movant makes a prima facie showing that it could satisfy the applicable standard.
Marriage of Lilleboe v. Lilleboe 453 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Lilleboe v. Lilleboe 453 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Itasca County Social Services ex rel.
Durkin v. Hinich 442 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1989
Durkin v. Hinich 442 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1989
Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 438 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 438 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Niemi v. Schachtschneider 435 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Niemi v. Schachtschneider 435 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Durkin v. Hinich 431 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Durkin v. Hinich 431 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In re the Marriage of Davis 418 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re the Marriage of Davis 418 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Knott v. Knott 418 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Knott v. Knott 418 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Barr v. Barr 416 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Barr v. Barr 416 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hovland v. Hovland 403 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hovland v. Hovland 403 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Axford v. Axford 402 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Axford v. Axford 402 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
§ 518.185 (1980), the supreme court stated, “This section does not specifically authorize the trial court to make findings based upon the affidavits.”
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 400 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 400 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(denial of custodial parent’s request to remove child from state was in fact a modification of custody and therefore an evidentiary hearing was required if non-custodial parent makes prima facie showing against removal); (evidentiary hearing required where moving party makes prima facie showing of substantial change in circumstances that could support custody change).
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kimmel v. Kimmel 392 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kimmel v. Kimmel 392 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Sydnes v. Sydnes 388 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Sydnes v. Sydnes 388 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad 388 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad 388 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Graham v. Graham 386 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Graham v. Graham 386 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
or the necessary showing of endangerment required by Minn.Stat.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by