Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Estate of Serbus v. Serbus, 324 N.W.2d 381.

66 citing documents.

Distinguished In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
This award is greater than the award in Serbus, where the wife received only “the sum of $4,000 and a life estate in the homestead and its furnishings.”
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
concluding that an antenuptial agreement lacked adequate consideration because husband entered the marriage with “significant assets” while wife had “very little” and wife “would leave the marriage with very little” if the agreement were enforced, despite her contributions to husband’s farming operation, her maintenance of the household, and raising the parties’ child); (stating that “[t]he consideration for the antenuptial contract was clearly inadequate” because wife would receive “far less th
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
Kinney , d at 125 (overruling McKee-Johnson and In re Estate of Serbus , in part).
In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
Lillian cites two cases in support of the court of appeals holding that there is such a requirement:
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 444 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1989
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 444 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1989
See, Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 343 , In re Malechow’s Estate, 143 Minn. 53, 57 , 172 N.W.
Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olson, Clough & Straumann, CPA’s v. Trayne Properties, Inc., ().
In Re Estate of Henry 426 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re Estate of Henry 426 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Montanari 404 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Montanari 404 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Higgins v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 400 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hille v. County of Wright 400 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Higgins v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 400 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(appellate courts must “give due deference to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses”).
Hille v. County of Wright 400 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Christensen v. Christensen 393 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Christensen v. Christensen 393 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ranik v. Ranik 383 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ranik v. Ranik 383 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Esselman v. Production Credit Ass'n of St. Cloud 380 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Esselman v. Production Credit Ass'n of St. Cloud 380 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Svoboda v. Svoboda 376 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Svoboda v. Svoboda 376 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Reed v. Christman 376 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Reed v. Christman 376 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Graffunder v. City of Mahtomedi 376 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Graffunder v. City of Mahtomedi 376 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(trial court’s finding is clearly erroneous if not reasonably supported by the evidence).
Stall v. First National Bank of Buhl 375 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Stall v. First National Bank of Buhl 375 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
52.-01; -85 (Minn.1982).
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Real Estate Dynamics, Inc. v. Genzler 369 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Real Estate Dynamics, Inc. v. Genzler 369 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Beckman v. Universal Enterprises, Inc. 367 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Beckman v. Universal Enterprises, Inc. 367 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Conservatorship of Mansur 367 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Conservatorship of Mansur 367 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Russell v. Special School District No. 6 366 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Russell v. Special School District No. 6 366 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
od cause belief that [Russell’s] tendency to physical confrontation with students is not remediable.” This court “must defer to the opportunity of the hearing examiner, as well as a majority of the Board itself, to see and hear the witnesses and to judge their credibility.” Fisher v. Independent School District No. 622
Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
see Hill, d at 53; Minn.Stat.
Noren v. Commissioner of Public Safety 363 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Noren v. Commissioner of Public Safety 363 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
On review, this court should uphold a finding of the trial court “unless clearly erroneous, either upon a clear demonstration that it is without substantial evi-dentiary support or that it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.”