Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wegan v. Village of Lexington, 309 N.W.2d 273.

97 citing documents.

State v. Hershberger 462 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1990
Weber v. City of Inver Grove Heights 461 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1990
Weber v. City of Inver Grove Heights 461 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1990
State v. Hershberger 462 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1990
See, (double jeopardy clause); , 281 n. 14 (Minn.1981) (equal protection); O’ (rights of criminally accused); State v. Oman, 261 Minn. 10, 21-22 , -23 (1961) (due process); Davis v. Pierse, 7 Minn. 1 , 6-7 ( Gil.
State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Braswell 460 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Braswell 460 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Courts should declare a statute unconstitutional “only when absolutely necessary, and then with extreme caution.” (citation omitted).
Cambridge State Bank v. Roemer 457 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1990
Overruled Cambridge State Bank v. Roemer 457 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1990
this court did not reject the acceptance-of-benefits doctrine in tax cases like Gale and Byard.
Olson v. Blaeser 458 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Olson v. Blaeser 458 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Merrill 450 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1990
State v. Merrill 450 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1990
appeal dismissed sub nom., Prest v. Herbst, 444 U.S. 804 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Montano 437 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Montano 437 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
We note also that an appellate court will declare a statute unconstitutional only “when absolutely necessary, and then with extreme caution.” (citation omitted).
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 437 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 437 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215 International Association of Fire Fighters
Beer Wholesalers, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co. 426 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Beer Wholesalers, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co. 426 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Estate of Turner 391 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1986
Lee v. Industrial Electric Co. 375 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lee v. Industrial Electric Co. 375 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(Dram Shop action was governed by six-year statute of limitation until legislature corrected constitutional infirmities of liquor liability statute.).
State v. Fuller 374 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1985
State v. Fuller 374 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1985
1215, 1219 , 43 L.Ed.2d 570 (1975); , 281 n. 14 (Minn.1981); O’ , 907 n. 14 (Minn.1977); State v. Oman, 261 Minn. 10, 21 , -23 (1961).
Glassman v. Miller 356 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1984
Glassman v. Miller 356 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1984
Complaint Concerning Winton 350 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1984
Complaint Concerning Winton 350 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1984
3026, 3032 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1978)
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
State v. Munnell 344 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Munnell 344 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johnson v. Moberg 334 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1983
Johnson v. Moberg 334 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1983
this court made it clear that it was a violation of the equal protection clause of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions to treat vendors of 3.2 beer as a different class than vendors of intoxicating liquor.
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
9 we held that the notice of claim and commencement of suit provisions of the Minnesota Civil Damages Act that distinguished between 3.2 beer and other liquor violated the equal protection clause of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions.
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
declaring the notice provisions and statute of limitations of the Civil Damages Act unconstitutional, has no impact on our decision in the cases at bar.
Nelson v. Peterson 313 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1981
Nelson v. Peterson 313 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1981
we find that “[t]he statute is fatally defective * * * because it cannot satisfy Guiiliams’ first and second factors.” The classifications are not genuine or relevant to the asserted statutory purposes.
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by