Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hardimon, 310 N.W.2d 564.

81 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
with the sword, intent must be determined “from his words (if any) and actions in the light of all the surrounding circumstances.” State v. Hardimon , (quotation omitted).
State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Safety, (noting that intent generally must be inferred “from [a person’s] words (if any) and actions in the light of all the surrounding circumstances”).
State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
State v. Critt 554 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Critt 554 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(standard of review of factual and legal issues in volun-tariness determinations).
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
a pre-Bouwman case, the defense wanted to call an alcohol expert to estimate the blood alcohol level of the defendant at the time of the shooting, based on a hypothetical question, and then to ask the expert about the physiological effects of alcohol.
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
On appeal this court will not reverse any findings of fact unless they are clearly in error, but this court will make an independent determination of voluntariness on the facts as found.”
State v. Erickson 449 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1989
State v. Erickson 449 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1989
State v. Brant 436 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Brant 436 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Ness 431 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1988
State v. Ness 431 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1988
at 728 (-74 (Minn.1982); ).
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
State v. Robinson 427 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1988
State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Johnson 417 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Johnson 417 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“Generally a person’s intent must be determined ‘from his words (if any) and actions in the light of all the surrounding circumstances.’ ” (quoting from W. LaFave and A. Scott, Criminal Law, at 203 (1972)).
State v. Duea 414 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Duea 414 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(intent is generally to be determined from defendant’s words, if any, and actions in light of all surrounding circumstances).
State v. Roehl 409 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Roehl 409 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
see Larson at 670 (jury permitted to infer intent to commit crime).
State v. Blawat 399 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Blawat 399 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
State v. Anderson 379 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1985
State v. Anderson 379 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1985
State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Raj 368 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Raj 368 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Peirce 364 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985