Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Ramsey v. Miller, 316 N.W.2d 917.

34 citing documents.

William B. Wood, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1 The development cost approach uses “cash flow analysis,” which is also known as “subdivision development analysis.” Appraisal Inst., The Appraisal of Real Estate 340 tbl.
County of Hennepin, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
the assessed valuation of the property as shown in the county auditor’s records should be admissible as bearing upon the fair market value of the property.” , 922 (Minn. 1982).
Landmark Cmty. Bank, N.A. v. Klingelhutz 927 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Landmark Cmty. Bank, N.A. v. Klingelhutz 927 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ramsey County v. Miller , , 919 (Minn. 1982) (quotation omitted) (stating principle in context of a condemnation proceeding).
City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'n 811 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'n 811 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
Eagle Creek Townhomes, LLP v. City of Shakopee 614 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Eagle Creek Townhomes, LLP v. City of Shakopee 614 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp. 566 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1997
Ferche Acquisitions, Inc. v. County of Benton 550 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1996
Ferche Acquisitions, Inc. v. County of Benton 550 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1996
Fair market value for property assessment purposes is “[t]he measure of compensation * * * which a purchaser willing but not required to buy property would pay to an owner willing but not required to sell it, taking into consideration the highest and best use * * see also City of St.
Hansen v. County of Hennepin 527 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1995
Hansen v. County of Hennepin 527 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1995
"The development cost approach is designed to reflect, through cash flow analysis, the current price a developer-purchaser would be warranted in paying for the land, given the cost of developing it and the probable proceeds from the sale of developed sites.” (citing American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, The Appraisal of Real Estate 140 (7th ed. 1978)).
Buzick v. City of Blaine 505 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1993
Buzick v. City of Blaine 505 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1993
The standard for the admission of evidence using the development cost approach to determine the fair market value of property was established in a condemnation proceeding
Buzick v. City of Blaine 491 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buzick v. City of Blaine 491 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Strom 493 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Strom 493 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1992
“To determine the fair market value of property in a condemnation proceeding ‘[a]ny competent evidence may be considered if it legitimately bears upon the market value.’ ” (quoting State v. Malecker, 265 Minn. 1, 5 , ).
State Ex Rel. Humprey v. Briggs 488 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humprey v. Briggs 488 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Harbor City Oil Co. 486 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Harbor City Oil Co. 486 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp. 481 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp. 481 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(emphasis omitted) (quoting Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 257 , 54 S.Ct.
Port Auth. of City of St. Paul v. Englund 464 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Port Auth. of City of St. Paul v. Englund 464 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
the supreme court discussed three traditional methods of real estate valuation.
State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc. 448 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc. 448 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Estate of Rechtzigel 385 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of Estate of Rechtzigel 385 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
where an appeal was taken from a denial of motion for additur in a condemnation proceeding.
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 317 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1982
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 317 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1982
In urging abandonment of the exclusionary rule, just recently decided, which decides the issue here.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by