Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Smith v. Employers' Overload Co., 314 N.W.2d 220.

117 citing documents.

Helen Brown, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Smith v. Emp’rs Overload Co. , (Minn .
Lamah v. Doherty Employment Group, Inc. 737 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Lamah v. Doherty Employment Group, Inc. 737 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
These businesses are “labor brokers engaged in the business of supplying unskilled labor to local companies for short-term assistance.” Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
In Re the Maltreatment & Disqualification of Kleven 736 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Maltreatment & Disqualification of Kleven 736 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See *710 Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981).
J.R.B. v. Department of Human Services 633 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
J.R.B. v. Department of Human Services 633 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981) (holding that because the unemployment compensation statute is remedial in nature it must, therefore, be liberally construed to effectuate the public policy); see also Baker v. American Family Mut.
Perovich v. Bituminous Consulting & Contracting Co. 614 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Perovich v. Bituminous Consulting & Contracting Co. 614 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Mbong v. New Horizons Nursing 608 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Mbong v. New Horizons Nursing 608 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
This issue was settled in Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981).
Moore Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Economic Security 545 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Moore Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Economic Security 545 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981).
Cook v. Playworks 541 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cook v. Playworks 541 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981).
Lotspeich v. Alliance Health Services 536 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lotspeich v. Alliance Health Services 536 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Loewen v. Lakeland Mental Health Center, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Loewen v. Lakeland Mental Health Center, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc. 529 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc. 529 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-24 (Minn.1981) (temporary employee's relationship with employer ends at the end of each assignment).
Prickett v. Circuit Science, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1994
Prickett v. Circuit Science, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1994
Smith v. Employers’ Overload
Behrendt v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 513 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Behrendt v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 513 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Peksa v. Fairview-Southdale Hosp. 512 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Shell v. Host International (Corp.) 513 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Peksa v. Fairview-Southdale Hosp. 512 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Forsberg v. Depth of Field/Fabrics
Shell v. Host International (Corp.) 513 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Hanke v. Safari Hair Adventure 512 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hanke v. Safari Hair Adventure 512 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981).
Valenty v. Medical Concepts Development, Inc. 503 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1993
Valenty v. Medical Concepts Development, Inc. 503 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1993
§ 268.03 (1992) that unemployment compensation is paid only to those persons “unemployed through no fault of their own.” See e.g., Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., Berzac v. Marsden Bldg.
Prickett v. Circuit Science, Inc. 499 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Prickett v. Circuit Science, Inc. 499 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Soussi v. Blue & White Service Corp. 498 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Soussi v. Blue & White Service Corp. 498 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Hansen v. C.W. Mears, Inc. 486 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hansen v. C.W. Mears, Inc. 486 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981).
Swanson v. Independent School District No. 625 484 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Swanson v. Independent School District No. 625 484 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The interpretation of the above statute is a question of law “upon which this court is free to exercise its independent judgment.” (quoting Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., ).
Markel v. City of Circle Pines 479 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1992
Markel v. City of Circle Pines 479 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1992
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co.
Weaver v. Minnesota Valley Laboratories, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Weaver v. Minnesota Valley Laboratories, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Smith v. Employers’ Overload Co., -22 (Minn.1981) (citations omitted).
McCourtney v. Imprimis Technology, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
McCourtney v. Imprimis Technology, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
The Commissioner’s legal conclusions, however, do not deserve similar deference; this court is “free to exercise its independent judgment.” ( Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter, ).
Fredrich v. Independent School District No. 720 465 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Fredrich v. Independent School District No. 720 465 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“A contract of employment is governed by the same rules applicable to other types of contract.”
Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 448 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by