Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Melina v. Chaplin, 327 N.W.2d 19.

325 citing documents.

Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“This issue was not argued in the briefs and accordingly must be deemed waived.”).
State of Minnesota v. Caroline Mildred Jochum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that appellate court only decides issues raised before the district court); (holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company 858 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“This issue was not argued in the briefs and accordingly must be deemed waived.”).
Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. Swanson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. Swanson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline v. Dorosh. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline v. Dorosh. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court 3 We note that this argument could be considered waived because issues not briefed on appeal are waived, including issues alluded to, but not argued, n.1 (Minn. 1998), and “[a]n assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by argument or authority” is waived “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection,” State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Dillahunt, n/k/a Tami L. Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Dillahunt, n/k/a Tami L. Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Pamela Jeanne Googe, Relator v. Capstone Services, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Pamela Jeanne Googe, Relator v. Capstone Services, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Greer v. State 836 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2013
Greer v. State 836 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2013
This argument is waived, however, (stating that issues not briefed on appeal “must be deemed waived”).
State v. Morrow 834 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 2013
State v. Morrow 834 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 2013
(stating that an issue that is "not argued in the briefs ...
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 834 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 834 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(providing that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Moore v. Hoff 821 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Moore v. Hoff 821 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
White v. Many Rivers West Ltd. Partnership 797 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
White v. Many Rivers West Ltd. Partnership 797 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Adoption of T.A.M. ex rel. J.M.J. v. L.A.M. 791 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Adoption of T.A.M. ex rel. J.M.J. v. L.A.M. 791 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. MOHOMOUD 788 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. MOHOMOUD 788 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
6 (concluding that issues not argued in briefs must be deemed waived on appeal); , 24 n. 1 (Minn.1992) (“Appellant’s brief does not address the first three claims, so these claims are deemed waived.”).
Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC. 785 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC. 785 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(stating that issues not presented to and considered by the district court are waived); (stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC 776 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC 776 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-21 (Minn.1982) (holding that issues not argued in briefs are waived).
State v. Hurd 763 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2009
State v. Hurd 763 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2009
State Dep’t of Labor Indus, v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an issue not adequately briefed).
Karnewie-Tuah v. Frazier 757 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Karnewie-Tuah v. Frazier 757 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Child of L.M.L. 730 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Child of L.M.L. 730 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
if the [district] court certifies that the question presented is important and doubtful”); (holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Minch v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District 723 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Minch v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District 723 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Jaskowiak v. CM Const. Co., Inc. 717 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Jaskowiak v. CM Const. Co., Inc. 717 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(providing that an issue not raised in parties' briefs is deemed waived).