Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jones v. Fleischhacker, 325 N.W.2d 633.

30 citing documents.

Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Another example of a in which a father allowed his son, who had a driver’s permit but not a driver’s license, to drive a vehicle.
Ernest Malisheske, Great West Casualty Company, Intervenor v. Kevin Kortan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ernest Malisheske, Great West Casualty Company, Intervenor v. Kevin Kortan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Ohler v. U.S., 529 U.S. 753, 755, 120 S. Ct. 1851, 1853 (2000) (“Generally, a party introducing evidence cannot complain on appeal that the evidence was erroneously admitted.”); (explaining that error in admission of evidence may be waived when objecting party itself introduces evidence).
In the Matter of the Cross Application of Anthony E. Sampair and Laurie K. Sampair to register the … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Cross Application of Anthony E. Sampair and Laurie K. Sampair to register the … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“[I]t is clear that error in admission 1 The district court stated as much: “Okay.
White v. White 676 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
White v. White 676 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Hagel v. Schoenbauer 532 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hagel v. Schoenbauer 532 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
As recent *258 ly as 1982, the supreme court cited the holdings of Mahowald and Knutson with approval and reaffirmed the rule that “it is irrelevant to the issue of negligence whether or not a claimant or a defendant had a valid driver’s license.” see also Kronzer, 305 Minn. at 427 , d at 194-95 (1975) (citing Mahowald and Knutson with approval in determining whether violation of a statute prohibiting the unauthorized practice of law constituted negligence per se).
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 461 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 461 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
May v. Strecker 453 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
May v. Strecker 453 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
“Employability, wage rates, training and the like are not within common knowledge and experience of a lay juror, and the admission of testimony on these subjects was within the discretion of the trial court judge.”
Lim v. Interstate System Steel Division, Inc. 435 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Lim v. Interstate System Steel Division, Inc. 435 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(entrustee found 68% causally negligent, entrustor found both 10% causally negligent and vicariously liable for entrustee's negligence).
Riewe v. Arnesen 381 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Riewe v. Arnesen 381 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the court stated: It has now become axiomatic in this state that the sufficiency of the foundation to qualify a witness as an expert is a question left almost entirely to the trial court and we will not reverse unless it is clearly apparent that the trial court was wrong.
Anderson v. Burdick Grain Co. 363 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Anderson v. Burdick Grain Co. 363 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Guardianship of Glenn 363 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Guardianship of Glenn 363 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of M.N.D. v. B.M.D. 356 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mnd v. Bmd 356 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of M.N.D. v. B.M.D. 356 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mnd v. Bmd 356 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Hughes 355 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Hughes 355 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 332 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1983
Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 332 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1983
we held that when an adult gave initial permission to a minor under Minn.Stat.