Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc., 320 N.W.2d 886.

48 citing documents.

U.S. Holdings, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met -Fab Indus., Inc., 8 Jundt fall under the subscription agreement and then consider (B) whether the district court abused its discretion by deciding to enforce the forum-selection clause against Jundt.
Minn. 2023
See Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., d 886, 891 (Minn. 1982).
Pamela Maslowski v. Prospect Funding Partners LLC, Prospect Funding Holdings LLC 890 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Pamela Maslowski v. Prospect Funding Partners LLC, Prospect Funding Holdings LLC 890 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., the Minnesota Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s approach and adopted the rule that forum-selection clauses are “not per se invalid, but enforceable in the discretion of the court if not unreasonable.” -90 (Minn. 1982).
Fair Isaac Corporation v. Michael Gordon, Callcredit Information Group Limited Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Fair Isaac Corporation v. Michael Gordon, Callcredit Information Group Limited Minn. Ct. App. 2016
12, 1990) (reaching conclusion about forum-selection clause through analogy to arbitration clause), and Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler–Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 640, 105 S. Ct. 3346, 3355 (1985) (making analogy to forum-selection clauses to determine adequacy of arbitration clause), with Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met- Fab Indus., Inc., (declining to extend holding of arbitration clause case to forum-selection clause case).
Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., –90 (Minn. 1982); Alpha Sys.
Lyon Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group with its principal offices at Marshall, Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lyon Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group with its principal offices at Marshall, Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When parties to a contract agree to a forum-selection clause, that agreement “should be given effect unless it is shown by the party seeking to avoid the agreement that to do so would be unfair or unreasonable.” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Forum-selection clauses in contracts which are termed adhesion — ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ — contracts and which are the product of unequal bargaining power between the parties are unreasonable.” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc.
Alpha Systems Integration, Inc. v. Silicon Graphics, Inc. 646 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Alpha Systems Integration, Inc. v. Silicon Graphics, Inc. 646 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab, Indus., Inc., (“it is incumbent upon the party seeking to escape the contract to show that to be forced to litigate in the contractual forum would be unreasonable”).
State v. Champion 594 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Champion 594 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Citizens Nat’l Bank v. Mankato Implement, Inc., (citing Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., ).
Losoya v. Richardson 584 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Losoya v. Richardson 584 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Citizens Nat’l Bank v. Mankato Implement, Inc., (quoting Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., (emphasis omitted)).
Ottman v. Fadden 575 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Ottman v. Fadden 575 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Metr-Fab Indus., Inc., (concluding forum selection clauses in contract of adhesions are unreasonable, in part, because they are product of unequal bargaining power).
TRWL Financial Establishment v. Select International, Inc. 527 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
TRWL Financial Establishment v. Select International, Inc. 527 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See generally Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc.
Mohn v. Independent School District No. 697, Eleveth 471 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Mohn v. Independent School District No. 697, Eleveth 471 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
No. 1, (citing Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indust., Inc., ).
Interfund Corp. v. O'BYRNE 462 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Interfund Corp. v. O'BYRNE 462 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc.
Johnson Bros. Corp. v. Arrowhead Co. 459 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Johnson Bros. Corp. v. Arrowhead Co. 459 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.
Cell v. Moore & Schley Securities Corp. 449 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1989
Cell v. Moore & Schley Securities Corp. 449 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1989
See Hauenstein & Bermeister
Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co. 447 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co. 447 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Hauenstein & Bermeister v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc., the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the decision of whether to enforce a forum selection clause falls within the discretion of the trial court.
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1989
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1989
In order for an action to constitute a waiver, there must be “an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must ‘clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.’ ” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., (emphasis omitted) (quoting Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 159
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
A waiver in contract law is “an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must ‘clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.’ ” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc., (emphasis omitted) (quoting Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 159 , ).
W.R. Millar Co. v. UCM Corp. 419 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
W.R. Millar Co. v. UCM Corp. 419 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.
Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.
Mech v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 410 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1987
Mech v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 410 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1987
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., -90 (Minn.1982).
Silver Ball Too, Ltd. v. B & E Enterprises 390 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Silver Ball Too, Ltd. v. B & E Enterprises 390 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In contract law, a waiver is defined as an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must “clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc., (emphasis omitted) (quoting *15 Kennedy v. Haase, 262 Minn. 155, 159 , ).
Vettleson v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Vettleson v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc., , 892 *429 (Minn.1982).
OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg AB 346 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg AB 346 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.