Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc., 326 N.W.2d 920.

76 citing documents.

Hoiland v. Minneapolis Children's Medical Center 457 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hoiland v. Minneapolis Children's Medical Center 457 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
*244 Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc., -26 (Minn.1982) (emphasis in original) (citations omitted).
Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
This is quite a different case from Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc., where the exculpatory clause called for complete exoneration from liability.
Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co. 447 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co. 447 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
12, 1988) (quoting Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc., -24 (Minn.1982)).
Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Medical acknowledges the testimony was an attempt to fulfill the requirements for a showing that the contract terms were unenforceable as a contract of adhesion under the.analysis outlined in Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Perl 415 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1987
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Perl 415 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 1987
See, e.g., Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.
Nelson v. International Harvester Corp. 394 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nelson v. International Harvester Corp. 394 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.
Malecha v. St. Croix Valley Skydiving Club, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Malecha v. St. Croix Valley Skydiving Club, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
1 In Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc., the supreme court set forth the standard applicable to exculpatory clauses and found an exculpatory clause in a health spa membership contract valid.
McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Walton v. Fujita Tourist Enterprises Co. 380 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Walton v. Fujita Tourist Enterprises Co. 380 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.
Otis Elevator Co. v. Don Stodola's Well Drilling Co. 372 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Otis Elevator Co. v. Don Stodola's Well Drilling Co. 372 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc., -23 (Minn.1982).
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Powell 352 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Powell 352 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The trial court also ruled that the non-waiver provision of the lease was unconscionable and void as against public policy, as the lease was a
Fena v. Wickstrom 348 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fena v. Wickstrom 348 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc., -23 (Minn.1982).