Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite American Motorist Insurance Co. v. Sarvela, 327 N.W.2d 77.

55 citing documents.

Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 666 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 2003
Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 666 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 2003
(invalidating a policy exclusion that precluded recovery of UIM benefits for which the insured paid a premium and concluding that policy exclusions attempting to prevent UIM coverage from following the person are inconsistent with the Minnesota No-Fault Act).
Wintz v. Colonial Insurance Co. of California 526 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wintz v. Colonial Insurance Co. of California 526 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
ANALYSIS Prior to the 1985 amendment, “family owned vehicle” exclusions were invalid to the extent they prevented first party (uninsured or underinsured) coverage from “following the person.”
Higgins v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 770 P.2d 324 Ariz. 1989
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
DeVille v. State Farm Mut.
AMCO Insurance Co. v. Lang 420 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1988
AMCO Insurance Co. v. Lang 420 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
DeVille v. State Farm Automobile Ins.
Ryan v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. 386 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ryan v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. 386 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nurmi v. Foremost Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nurmi v. Foremost Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Great American Insurance Co. v. Sticha 374 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Great American Insurance Co. v. Sticha 374 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1985
Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1985
to bolster his argument.
Sibbert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1985
Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1985
Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1985
Sibbert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1985
and concluded that policy exclusions which prevent under-insured motorist coverage from following the person may not be enforced.
Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1985
that policy exclusions which prevent underinsured motorist coverage from following the person may not be enforced.
Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1985
this court voided a policy exclusion which precluded underinsured motorist coverage for an insured’s injuries arising from an accident in a vehicle owned by the insured but not insured under the insurance policy.
Crews v. Criterion Insurance Co. 370 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Crews v. Criterion Insurance Co. 370 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Liability coverage follows motor vehicles rather than individuals, and has been treated differently by the Minnesota Supreme Court, see, e.g., Too-mey v. Krone.
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink 370 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink 370 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rector v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 369 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rector v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 369 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 367 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 367 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ballanger v. Toenjes 362 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ballanger v. Toenjes 362 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
when quoted out of context, seems to determine this matter in Beukhof’s favor: “Thus, underinsured coverage like uninsured is not subject to the Act’s motorcycle exclusions.” d at 78 .
Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hoeschen v. South Carolina Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hoeschen v. South Carolina Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 346 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1984
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 346 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1984
(the provisions for underinsured motorist coverage, existing before the No-Fault Act, “were incorporated into the No-Fault Act unchanged”).
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 336 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1983