Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dolder v. Griffin, 323 N.W.2d 773.

67 citing documents.

Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Mechanic’s lien laws are strictly 14 construed as to the question [of] whether a lien attaches, but are construed liberally after the lien has been created.”
Landform Professional Services, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Dolder v. Griffin , (holding that signatory to enforceable purchase agreement owns equitable interest in relevant property).
M & G Services, Inc. v. Buffalo Lake Advanced Biofuels, LLC 895 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
M & G Services, Inc. v. Buffalo Lake Advanced Biofuels, LLC 895 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“While the Mechanic’s Lien Act is to be liberally construed as a remedial act, yet mechanics’ liens exist only by virtue of the statute creating them, and such statutes must be strictly followed with reference to all requirements upon which the right to a lien depends.” (quotation omitted).
Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP 883 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2016
T & R Flooring, LLC v. Beverly J. O'Byrne, Eastwood Bank, Mac's Plumbing Service, Inc., Johnson Comfort Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
T & R Flooring, LLC v. Beverly J. O'Byrne, Eastwood Bank, Mac's Plumbing Service, Inc., Johnson Comfort Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
M. Freidheim Co., d 318, 321 (Minn. App. 1986) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1986); (stating that the requirement of prelien notice is meant to “remedy the unfairness arising from the 3 foreclosure of mechanics liens on property of unsuspecting owners” (quotation omitted)).
Patrick Exner, Relator v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 849 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Patrick Exner, Relator v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 849 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Minnwest Bank v. Arends 802 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Minnwest Bank v. Arends 802 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-80 (Minn.1982) (observing that mechanic’s-lien statutes are liberally construed after the lien has been created); London Constr.
Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 785 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2010
Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 785 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2010
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 777 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 2010
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 777 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 2010
“Mechanic’s lien laws are strictly construed as to the question whether a lien attaches, but are construed liberally after the lien has been created.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Mechanics’ liens are creatures of statute and exist only because of the statute creating them.”
Twin City Pipe Trades Service Ass'n v. Peak Mechanical, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Twin City Pipe Trades Service Ass'n v. Peak Mechanical, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-80 (Minn.1982) (discussing the tension between the need for prelien notice to unsuspecting owners and the remedial purpose of protecting laborers).
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 2001
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 2001
Niewind v. Carlson 628 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Niewind v. Carlson 628 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Steinhilber v. Prairie Pine Mutual Insurance Co. 533 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Steinhilber v. Prairie Pine Mutual Insurance Co. 533 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
DAVID-THOMAS COMPANIES, INC. v. Voss 517 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
DAVID-THOMAS COMPANIES, INC. v. Voss 517 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(notice requirement of section 514.011 is a prerequisite to creation of valid lien and thus must be strictly followed) (quoting 76 A.L.R.3d 605 , 618 (1977)).
Bendiske Concrete & Masonry, Inc. v. Barthel Construction, Inc. 515 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Bendiske Concrete & Masonry, Inc. v. Barthel Construction, Inc. 515 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Emison v. J. Paul Sterns Co. 488 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Emison v. J. Paul Sterns Co. 488 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Pella Products, Inc. v. Arvig Telephone Co. 488 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Pella Products, Inc. v. Arvig Telephone Co. 488 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
C. Kowalski, Inc. v. Davis 472 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
C. Kowalski, Inc. v. Davis 472 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“Mechanics’ lien laws are strictly construed as to the question whether a lien attaches, but are construed liberally after the lien has been created.” (quoting Annot., 76 A.L.R.3d 605 , 618 (1977)).
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 457 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 457 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
MERLE'S CONST. CO., INC. v. Berg 442 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1989
MERLE'S CONST. CO., INC. v. Berg 442 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1989
Berg v. Merle's Construction Co. 429 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Berg v. Merle's Construction Co. 429 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-80 (Minn.1982); pet for rev. denied (Minn. July 17, 1985).
Christle v. Marberg 421 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Christle v. Marberg 421 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(quoting Polivka Logan Designers, Inc. v. Ende, 312 Minn. 171, 176 , ).
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 415 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-80 (Minn.1982); Enviro-Fab, pet.
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 415 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1987