Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ulvinen, 313 N.W.2d 425.

228 citing documents.

State v. Elmourabit 356 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Elmourabit 356 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Strother 354 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Strother 354 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. McGath 352 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. McGath 352 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
-28 (Minn.1981), when the state of mind of the deceased was not in issue, such statements were prejudicial error, likely to lead the jury to conclude that the deceased was afraid of her mother-in-law and that therefore defendant probably disliked her enough to kill her.
State v. Hayes 351 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Hayes 351 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Their conduct shows “a high level of activity on the part of an aider and abetter in the form of conduct that encourages another to act.”
State v. Campion 353 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
King v. State 353 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
King v. State 353 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Campion 353 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Duemke 352 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Roberts 350 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Duemke 352 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Roberts 350 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution and it is necessary to assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contrary evidence, (citation omitted)
State v. Soine 348 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Soine 348 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
refined but did not alter this standard.
In Re the Welfare of D.M.K. 343 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of D.M.K. 343 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This statute provides that a person is criminally liable for a crime committed by another if he “intentionally aids, advises, hires, counsels or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime.” the court discussed the level of active conduct needed to satisfy Minn.Stat.
State v. Hoffman 328 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1982
State v. Hoffman 328 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1982
State v. Blanchard 315 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1982
State v. Blanchard 315 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1982
6 we considered whether hearsay statements concerning a homicide victim’s fear of a defendant are admissible.