DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Plan, 316 N.W.2d 727.

37 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    -29 (Minn. 1982) (quotation omitted).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “Whether a defendant was ‘formally adjudicated’ guilty of an offense is usually determined by looking at the official judgment of conv iction.” State v. Plan
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    Minnesota courts have permitted a photograph of a murder victim wearing his police uniform, –79 (Minn. 2008), testimony that the victim was honorably discharged from the military, and testimony that the victim was a police officer’s son
  • State of Minnesota v. Eric Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State of Minnesota v. Eric Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Hodgson 512 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Hodgson 512 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1994
    The prosecution has some leeway to show that spark and present the victim as a human being as long as it is not an “attempt to evoke any undue sympathy or inflame the jury’s passions.”
  • State v. Wilbur 445 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Wilbur 445 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    “Whether a defendant was ‘formally adjudicated’ guilty of an offense is usually determined by looking at the official judgment of conviction which appears as a separate sheet in the file.”
  • State v. Obasi 427 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Obasi 427 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    See, (intent shown by gun pointed at victim and fired at short range without provocation by victim).
  • State v. Harris 405 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Harris 405 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1987
    Intent to cause death “may be inferred from the manner of shooting the victim.” State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , (citation omitted)
  • State v. French 400 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. French 400 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hathaway 379 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Hathaway 379 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1985
    Hathaway’s in which we held that references to the fact that the victim was a son of a police officer in the prosecutor’s opening statement and direct examination of two witnesses were not inflammatory.
  • State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
    The prosecution has some leeway to show that spark and present the victim as a human being as long as it is not an “attempt to invoke any undue sympathy or inflame the jury’s passions.”
  • State v. Jackson 363 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1985
  • Explained State v. Jackson 363 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1985
    4 . we explained that a conviction must be vacated under section 609.04 only if defendant was “formally adjudicated” guilty of that offense.
  • State v. Eppler 362 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Eppler 362 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1985
  • Johnson v. State 324 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1982
  • Johnson v. State 324 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Tenhoff 322 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Tenhoff 322 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1982
    Therefore, given the fact that defendant was formally adjudicated guilty of both offenses — —it is clear that defendant is entitled to the requested relief.
  • State v. Lee 322 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Lee 322 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1982
    (upholding admission in murder trial of evidence that victim was son of policeman, where prosecutor did not use the evidence in an attempt to inflame the passions of the jury).