Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361.

377 citing documents.

Application of Minnegasco 566 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
“The general rule is that * * ⅜ the [dispositive] decision is to be given retroactive effect.”
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
(applying the federal test articulated in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct.
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
Hapka v. Paquin Farms 458 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1990
Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human Services 422 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human Services 422 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Tereault v. Palmer 413 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tereault v. Palmer 413 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor Store 373 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor Store 373 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Schreier v. State 369 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Schreier v. State 369 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sweeney v. Special School District No. 1 368 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sweeney v. Special School District No. 1 368 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ario v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 367 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1985
Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1984
Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1984
The general rule is that “absent special circumstances or specific pronouncements by the overruling court that its decision is to be applied prospectively only, the decision is to be given retroactive effect.”
Bongard v. Bongard 342 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Bongard v. Bongard 342 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
that its decision is to be applied prospectively only.”
McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. 336 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1983
McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. 336 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1983
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ryan 330 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1983
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ryan 330 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1983
Wolner v. Mahaska Industries, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1982
Wolner v. Mahaska Industries, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1982
We have recognized the general rule of retroactivity, “that, absent special circumstances or specific pronouncements by the overruling court that its decision is to be applied prospectively only, the decision is to be given retroactive effect.” (citations omitted).