DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ludtke, 306 N.W.2d 111.

32 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
    (upholding the warrantless search of a duffle bag under the automobile exception); State v. Ludtke , –14 (Minn. 1981) (upholding the warrantless search of a satchel located in a car, although under a pre-Ross legal framework).
  • A18-0659 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State v. Harris 590 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Harris 590 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
    1717 , 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978)
  • State v. Hardy 577 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Hardy 577 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Cornell 491 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Cornell 491 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    The second search is valid as a
  • State v. Dickerson 481 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Dickerson 481 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1992
    State v. Bitterman, 304 Minn. 481, 486 , 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 9.4(c) at 524 (2d ed. 1987).
  • State v. Hart 412 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Hart 412 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Hanson 364 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Hanson 364 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1985
    The search of Gordon’s (upholding frisk of two motorists on highway after finding small amount of marijuana on them, there being an objective basis for a protective weapons frisk; avoiding issue whether officers had probable cause to believe they would find more drugs).
  • State v. Hinkel 353 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Hinkel 353 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    likewise does not justify removal.
  • Wensman v. State 342 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1984
  • Wensman v. State 342 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Schinzing 342 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Schinzing 342 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1983
    1717 , 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978), discussed in 1 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 1.2(g) (Supp.1982), and relied upon by this court in a number of cases
  • State v. Speak 339 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Speak 339 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1983
    1717 , 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978)
  • State v. Whisonant 331 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Whisonant 331 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1983
    1717 , 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978)
  • State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Pleas 329 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1983
    1717 , 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978), discussed in 1 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 1.2(g) (Supp.1982), and relied upon by this court in a number of cases
  • State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
    (while plastic bag of powder was soft and presumably did not feel like a weapon through the clothing, the officer was justified in reaching in and seizing it because he had already lawfully found a plastic bag of marijuana in the defendant’s other pocket and therefore could assume that this packet which he