Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cairl v. State, 323 N.W.2d 20.

134 citing documents.

Richard Joseph Terfehr v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard Joseph Terfehr v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
No. 16, (stating that immunity “must be narrowly construed” (quotation omitted)).
Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, vs. … Minn. 2025
Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, vs. … Minn. 2025
We have observed that “almost every act involves some measure of discretion, and yet undoubtedly not every act of government is entitled to discretionary immunity.”
Christine L. Rathbun v. Fillmore County Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Christine L. Rathbun v. Fillmore County Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Conlin, d at 400; (noting that statutory immunity is narrowly construed because it is an exception to the general rule of governmental liability).
Joel Wells v. Rick E. Mattox Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joel Wells v. Rick E. Mattox Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Under the common law, a party generally owes no duty to warn or protect another person who may be injured by a third party unless the “defendant stands in some special relationship to either the person whose conduct needs to be controlled or to the foreseeable victim of that conduct.” n.7 (Minn. 1982).
Delmer v. Fladwood v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Delmer v. Fladwood v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The doctrine “must be narrowly construed in light of the fact that it is an exception to the general rule of governmental liability.” (quotations omitted).
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 877 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2016
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 877 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2016
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
1 See, , 25 n. 7 (Minn.1982) (“[W]hen we speak of a duty to warn we speak in terms of having first found the requisite special relationship to exist.”).
Schroeder v. St. Louis County 708 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2006
Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
-29 (Minn.1984) (psychiatrist owed duty to third party where patient threatens foreseeable harm to that party and psychiatrist has the ability to control the risk of harm); , 25 n. 7, 26 (Minn.1982) (treatment facility may owe duty to warn identifiable third parties of violent propensities of a mentally disabled youth whom it released if that youth poses a specific threat to those parties).
City of Red Wing v. Ellsworth Community School District 617 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Red Wing v. Ellsworth Community School District 617 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Nelson, d at 641 (municipality’s tort immunity not waived when employee purchased private liability insurance); -27 (Minn.1982) (purchase of professional liability insurance by state employee did not constitute waiver of immunity).
S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16 580 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1998
S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16 580 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1998
Gerber v. Neveaux 578 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Gerber v. Neveaux 578 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Angell v. Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority 578 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1998
Angell v. Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority 578 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1998
The analysis may involve some difficulty because “almost every act involves some measure of discretion, and yet undoubtedly not every act of government is entitled to [statutory] immunity.”
Angell v. Hennepin County 565 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Angell v. Hennepin County 565 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations 563 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations 563 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Norton v. County of Le Sueur 565 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Norton v. County of Le Sueur 565 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
46^47 (Minn.1996); -24 (Minn.1982) (decision to release dangerous youth protected because decision implicated various policy considerations); -72 (Minn.1978) (decision by members of parole board to medically parole mentally ill prisoner, who then raped a woman, was protected because it requir
Terwilliger v. Hennepin County 561 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1997
Terwilliger v. Hennepin County 561 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1997
Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 553 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1996
Johnson v. State 553 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1996
Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home Administrators 552 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1996
Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home Administrators 552 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1996
While certainly “almost every act involves some measure of discretion, * * * not every act of government is entitled to discretionary [e.g., statutory] immunity.” *717 Nusbaum, d at 719 ().
Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 553 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1996
Planning level conduct includes: decisions regarding deployment of police forces, Silver v. City of Minneapolis, 284 Minn. 266 , *413 271, a decision to release a mentally retarded youth from a state institution for a holiday home visit, and a decision to place certain warning signs only on county roads and recognized rights-of-way, Steinke, d at 176 .
Johnson v. State 553 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1996
Terwilliger v. Hennepin County 542 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Terwilliger v. Hennepin County 542 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In support of his decision, in which a juvenile with a proclivity to set fires, while on leave from a state treatment facility, set fire to an apartment building, killing one person and seriously injuring another.
Vrieze v. New Century Homes, Inc. 542 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Vrieze v. New Century Homes, Inc. 542 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Johnson v. State 536 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Johnson v. State 536 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
at 55 ; , 23 n. 1 (Minn.1982) (distinguishing discretionary decision to release from the negligent implementation of that decision) ().
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
25 n. 7 (Minn.1982); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314 (no duty to take action to aid or protect others).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by