Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Hopf, 323 N.W.2d 746.

28 citing documents.

Comm'r of Revenue v. Enbridge Energy, LP 923 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2019
Comm'r of Revenue v. Enbridge Energy, LP 923 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2019
Spannaus v. Hopf , , 752 (Minn. 1982) (quoting 1 Kenneth Culp Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 5.03, at 299 (1958) ); see also Marks v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 327 (Minn. 2016) ("Administrative agencies may adopt regulations to implement or make specific the language of a statute.").
Ochs v. Streater, Inc. 568 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Ochs v. Streater, Inc. 568 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See, e.g., State by Spannaus v. Hopf (a condemnation proceeding is commenced by filing petition); Minn. R. Civ.
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
3249, 3254 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985); (citing Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 189-90 , ).
Goward v. City of Minneapolis 456 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Goward v. City of Minneapolis 456 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
at 2185-2186 (live nude dancing); (advertising devices near churches, schools, and scenic areas).
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services 442 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1989
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services 442 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1989
In Re the Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency 439 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1989
In Re the Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency 439 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1989
the state petitioned to condemn defendant’s outdoor advertising signs.
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services 428 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services 428 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rules promulgated under statutory authority are valid and binding upon courts if the statute is, but only if “(a) within the granted power, (b) issued pursuant to proper procedure and (c) reasonable.” (quoting K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Section 50.03 at 299 (1st ed. 1958) (emphasis added).
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human Services 419 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human Services 419 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See White Bear Lake Care Center, Inc., v. Minnesota Dep’t of Public Welfare, (recognizing the prior department rule ("Rule 49”) as an authorized and properly promulgated legislative rule); (regulation adopted pursuant to statutory authority was legislative rule where the statute granted the Commissioner of Transportation authority "to promulgate rules and regulations governing the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising devices as may be necessary to carry out the policy of the state
Keefe v. Cargill, Inc. 393 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Keefe v. Cargill, Inc. 393 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Middlemist v. City of Plymouth 387 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Middlemist v. City of Plymouth 387 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Condemnation Proceeding for the Wilmarth Line of the CU Project 380 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Condemnation Proceeding for the Wilmarth Line of the CU Project 380 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State by Spannaus v. Hopf Minn.Stat.
Good Neighbor Care Center v. City of Little Canada 357 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Good Neighbor Care Center v. City of Little Canada 357 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State by Spannaus v. Hopf (legislative classification must be rationally related to a legitimate governmental objective); State v. Knox, 311 Minn. 314, 322
Blocher Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 347 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Blocher Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 347 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The trial court, citing State v. Hopf concluded that the rule is “a reasonable and not overly restrictive interpretation of the statute.” We agree with both the reasoning and conclu--sions of the trial court.
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist 338 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1983
715, 722 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659 (1981)

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by