DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hoffman, 328 N.W.2d 709.

58 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Warren Dean Schroyer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Warren Dean Schroyer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State v. Ambaye 616 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Ambaye 616 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
    (stating that only a jury can decide whether the defendant possessed the requisite capacity to commit the crime charged).
  • State v. Martin 591 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Martin 591 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
  • In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
  • In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 560 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
    1398 , 113 L.Ed.2d 453 (1991) (precluding psychiatric testimony relating to premeditation and intent did not deny defendant due process); (same); -16 (Minn.1982) (finding that defendant’s right to present evidence of mental capacity only arises during the mental illness phase, and not the guilt phase); (finding that evidence of mental capacity is irrelevant to determine intent during state’s case be
  • In Re the Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 542 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • In Re the Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 542 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • Matter of Linehan 518 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Stewart 486 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Stewart 486 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    See Berkelman, d at 396-97 ; However, unlike the adjudicatory jury, the grand jury must receive all information that will provide the basis for its probable cause determination.
  • Silberstein v. Cordie 474 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • Silberstein v. Cordie 474 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    (holding defendant has due process right under federal and state constitutions to assert mental illness defense.)
  • State v. Brom 463 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Brom 463 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1990
    -17 (Minn.1982) (psychiatric testimony confined to mental illness phase of trial and not admissible with respect to determining premeditation); (affirming rejection of psychiatric testimony on the issue of premeditation).
  • State v. Gore 451 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Gore 451 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1990
    (Minn.1985) (divorce because of another man not sufficient provocation); (wife’s insults not requisite provocation).
  • State v. Blasus 445 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Blasus 445 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1989
    File No. C5-86-959, appeal dismissed on motion of defendant, July 9, 1986, (defendant created community uproar in small northwestern Minnesota town by reporting to authorities that his daughter had been abducted while walking home from school when in fact he had killed her after she resisted his sexual advances); (defendant killed his wife and dismembered her body).
  • State v. Brant 436 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Brant 436 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Hennum 428 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Hennum 428 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    (jury found premeditation; therefore, crime not committed in heat of passion).
  • Wold v. State 430 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1988
  • Wold v. State 430 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Bergstrom 413 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Bergstrom 413 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    d at 705 ; (jury should be instructed evidence of mental capacity is not to be considered on the issue of intent in the first stage of the trial).
  • State v. Jackman 396 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Jackman 396 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1986
    this court outlined a procedure to follow under the former rules when a “defendant has entered a plea of not guilty by reason of mental illness, but has not elected to bifurcate the trial.” Id.
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    a. Manslaughter in the first-degree The trial court’s refusal to submit instructions on heat of passion manslaughter has been considered by the Minnesota Supreme Court recently in the following seven cases: and State v. Leinweber, 203 Minn. 414
  • State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
    we found a defendant who was described by police officers as coherent and responsive, but who broke down four or five times *731 during questioning, to have been capable of making a voluntary confession.
  • State v. Koop 380 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Koop 380 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Koop 375 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1985