Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners v. Murr, 325 N.W.2d 128.

15 citing documents.

Neighborhood School Coalition v. Independent School District No. 279 484 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
No. 11, -31 (Minn.1982) (deference to the fact finding processes of a school board acting in an administrative capacity).
Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11 459 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1990
No. 11, -31 (Minn.1982) (“This limited judicial role in the application of substantial evidence stems from the recognition that considerable judicial deference should be extended to the fact-finding processes of a school board * * *.”).
In Re the Proposed Termination of James E. Johnson's Teaching Contract With Independent School District No. 709 451 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11
Urbahl v. Independent School District No. 181 396 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kelly v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 361 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
This court may overturn the Board’s decision to terminate Strand when the decision was “fraudulent, arbitrary, unreasonable, not supported by substantial evidence on the record, not within the school board’s jurisdiction, or is based on an erroneous theory of law.” Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, ).
Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1 365 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
II This court may overturn the district’s decision to terminate the teachers if the decision was “fraudulent, arbitrary, unreasonable, not supported by substantial evidence on the record, not within the school board’s jurisdiction, or is based on an erroneous theory of law.” Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, ).
Berger v. Independent School District No. 706 362 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Freier v. Independent School District No. 197 356 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11, the school board terminated a teacher and the district court reversed because the evidence was not sufficient.
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 353 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 11, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832
Ostlund v. Independent School District No. 47, Sauk Rapids 354 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 11, (citing Ganyo v. Independent School Dist.
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin 349 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 11, (citing Ganyo v. Independent School Dist.
State Ex Rel. Dreyer v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 542 344 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1984
No. 11, (citing Ganyo v. Independent School Dist.
Laird v. Independent School District No. 317 346 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1984
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent *156 School District, -31 (Minn.1982)
Grinolds v. Independent School District No. 597 346 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1984
No. 11, Liffrig v. Independent School Dist.