Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Zuehlke, 320 N.W.2d 79.

48 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Danny Lee Harper, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Hill 918 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Hill 918 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2536 , 2542, 81 L.Ed.2d 425 (1984) ); see also State v. Zuehlke , , 81 (Minn. 1982) ("In such a situation if the defendant pleads guilty to the misdemeanor charge, it is he who has fragmented the prosecution and he therefore cannot complain that he is being serially prosecuted if the state continues with the prosecution of the remaining charge."); State v. Zimmerman
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
and that we should therefore conclude 7 that his crimes arose from a continuing and uninterrupted course of conduct.
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
State v. Ferguson 808 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2012
State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Williams, d at 841-42 ; (noting the state has the burden of proof on the single behavioral incident issue).
State v. Reimer 625 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Reimer 625 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Williams 608 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 2000
State v. Williams 608 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 2000
(concluding state has burden at sentencing hearing to prove by a preponderance of the evidence defendant’s criminal history); (noting state has burden of proof on single behavioral incident issue).
State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
State v. Pettee 538 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1995
State v. Pettee 538 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1995
State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520
State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Secrest 437 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Secrest 437 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
State v. Reuer 396 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Reuer 396 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Under the statute, “if two offenses * * * are committed in a unitary course of criminal conduct, then the state should join the * * * prosecution[s] in a single prosecution * * *.” (citing State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121 , ).
State v. Studdard 352 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1984
State v. Studdard 352 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1984
State v. McAlpine 352 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. McAlpine 352 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
indicates the standard for determining whether a person’s conduct constitutes more than one intentional offense for purposes of Minn.Stat.
State v. Wurst 350 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Zimmerman 352 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Wurst 350 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(reckless driving from Superior, Wisconsin to Duluth, Minnesota done to avoid apprehension by police in pursuit of defendant); (reckless driving was part of the same behavioral incident as the offense of unauthorized use where both violations occurred during a continuous and uninterrupted course of driving and the defendant drove recklessly to avoid apprehension for the other charge); State v. Boucher, 286 Minn. 475, 479-80
State v. Zimmerman 352 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Beito 332 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
State v. Beito 332 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1983
State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
Explained State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
: That there is a factual nature to the determination by the trial court — — is illustrated by considering the case of State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , where we held that the offense of drivin
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
: That there is a factual nature to the determination by the trial court — — is illustrated by considering the case of State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , where we held that the offense of drivin