Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wright, 310 N.W.2d 461.
- State v. Van Ruler 378 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Halverson 373 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Hemmings 360 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Hemmings 360 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Case 350 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Case 350 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Kinsky 348 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Kinsky
348 N.W.2d 319
Minn. 1984
“[A] sentencing court may stay execution of a presumptively executed sentence if the facts indicate that the defendant is particularly amenable to treatment in a probationary setting.”
- State v. Northard 348 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Northard 348 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Feinstein 338 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1983
- State v. Heywood 338 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1983
- State v. Feinstein 338 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1983
-
State v. Heywood
338 N.W.2d 243
Minn. 1983
Similarly, we approved reliance on the particular amenability of a defendant to probation as a basis for a dispositional departure in the form of a stay of the presumptively executed sentence.
- State v. King 337 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1983
- State v. King 337 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1983
- State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
- State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
- State v. Clemmer 328 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
- State v. Clemmer 328 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
- State v. Hennessy 328 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1983
- State v. Bentley 329 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1983
- State v. Hennessy 328 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1983
- State v. Bentley 329 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1983
- State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982
- State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982
- State v. Kraft 326 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1982
- State v. Kraft 326 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1982
- State v. Trog 323 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1982
- State v. Trog 323 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1982