Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Stumm, 312 N.W.2d 248.

66 citing documents.

State v. Jones 328 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1983
State v. Jones 328 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1983
State v. Norton 328 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1982
State v. Norton 328 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1982
State v. Van Gorden 326 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1982
State v. Van Gorden 326 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1982
State v. Herberg 324 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1982
State v. Herberg 324 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1982
However, we agree with the district court that this is the extremely rare case — — in which a sentence greater than double the presumptive sentence is justified.
State v. Partlow 321 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1982
State v. Partlow 321 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1982
However, the prosecutor did not assert, nor did the medical reports or testimony state
State v. Martinez 319 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1982
State v. Martinez 319 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1982
where we held that the absolute vulnerability of the 2-year-old victim, the cruelty of the defendant and his indifference to the child’s medical needs after the death-producing blows were struck, justified more than a doubling of the presump *700 tive guideline sentence.
State v. Hagen 317 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1982
State v. Hagen 317 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1982
State v. Rohrer 317 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1982
State v. Rohrer 317 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1982
However, because of the absolute vulnerability of the victim and the particular cruelty of petitioner in committing the offense, and possibly could have imposed a