DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClay, 310 N.W.2d 683.

76 citing documents.

  • State v. Cook 351 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Cook 351 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    (victim threatened and put in fear — departure improper) (bystanders and neighbors threatened and in fear — departure proper).
  • State v. Hamilton 348 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Hamilton 348 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    held gratuitous cruelty to the victims is a valid reason for departure.
  • State v. Broten 343 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Broten 343 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1984
    -37 (Minn.1982) (robbery was more serious than typical robbery because defendant committed the robbery in the presence of young children); (robbery was more serious than typical robbery because the defendants put more people in fear, kidnapped one person and assaulted several others during their escape).
  • State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
    (qualitative assessment of facts justified conclusion that defendant’s conduct was sufficiently different in degree to justify departure); (robbery was more aggravated form of armed robbery because defendant put a large number of people in fear, kidnapped one person, and assaulted several others during escape).
  • State v. King 337 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1983
  • State v. King 337 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1983
    we upheld a durational departure in an aggravated robbery case because the robbery in question was more aggravated than the typical aggravated robbery, the conduct underlying the offense being especially serious and dangerous.
  • State v. Gartland 330 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Gartland 330 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Vazquez 330 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Vazquez 330 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1983
    we considered appeals by code-fendants, McClay and Scruggs, who both pleaded guilty to the same aggravated robbery.
  • State v. Schmit 329 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Schmit 329 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Magnan 328 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Magnan 328 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Norton 328 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Norton 328 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Profit 323 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Profit 323 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1982
    we allowed departure because “looking at the overall course of conduct, *37 the robbery was a more aggravated kind of armed robbery than the typical one, with defendants putting more people in fear, kidnapping one person, and assaulting several others during their escape.
  • State v. Womack 319 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Womack 319 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Rott 313 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Rott 313 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1981