Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Davis v. Furlong, 328 N.W.2d 150.

28 citing documents.

Serene E. Warren, as beneficiary of the 2011 Arizona NG Trust 102, 8008 Meadow Trust 102, 2011 Lafayette … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(noting that Minnesota follows “the almost universal rule that matters of procedure and remedies [are] 18 conclude that the trust agreement is unambiguous.
A23-1267 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-29 (Minn. 2009) (holding that Minnesota six-year statute of limitations is procedural and, thus, applies in Minnesota court instead of Pennsylvania two-year statute of limitations); -53 (Minn. 1983) (holding that Minnesota rule concerning joinder of 10 parties is procedural and, thus, applies in Minnesota court instead of Wisconsin direct- action statute).
Carley Pesente v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Carley Pesente v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In contract cases, the lex loci rule would apply “the law of the place of the contractual transaction.”
In the Matter of: American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2007-5. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting that Minnesota follows “th e almost universal rule that matters of procedure and remedies [are] governed by the la w of the forum state”); Miliken & Co. v. Eagle Packaging Co. , n.1 (Minn. 1980) (stating that Minnesota courts are “committed to the rule that parties m ay
Nicol Nagel, individually and ESY Investments, LLC, a California limited liability company v. Tracy A. Westen 865 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nicol Nagel, individually and ESY Investments, LLC, a California limited liability company v. Tracy A. Westen 865 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Instead, the supreme court follows “the almost universal rule that matters of procedure and remedies [are] governed by the law of the forum state.” (refusing to extend the five-factor test to conflicts of procedure); see Weston v. Jones, 160 Minn. 32, 35, 199 N.W.
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
Fleeger v. Wyeth 771 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2009
Fleeger v. Wyeth 771 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2009
Despite the legislature’s assumption that we would apply the Lefler analysis to all choice-of-law cases, 153 (Minn.1983), where we applied Minnesota’s procedural rules regarding joinder to a case brought in Minnesota by a Minnesota resident arising out of a Wisconsin automobile accident.
Christian v. Birch 763 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Christian v. Birch 763 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
The Minnesota Supreme Court has unequivocally held that “the Milkovieh analysis should not be extended to conflicts of procedure” based on “the almost universal rule that matters of procedure and remedies [are] governed by the law of the forum state.”
Danielson v. National Supply Co. 670 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Danielson v. National Supply Co. 670 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
On the other hand, if the matter is one of procedural law, Minnesota follows the “almost universal rule that matters of procedure and remedies [are] governed by the law of the forum state.” (citation omitted).
Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss 598 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss 598 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
P. 3.01(a) (stating civil actions commenced when summons served on defendant); (“[M]atters of procedure and remedies [are] governed by the law of the forum state.” (citations omitted)).
Zaretsky v. Molecular Biosystems, Inc. 464 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Zaretsky v. Molecular Biosystems, Inc. 464 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
the supreme court stated “[t]his court has for many years followed the almost universal rule that matters of procedure and rem *826 edies were governed by the law of the forum state” (citations omitted).
Marriage of Hodges v. Hodges 415 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hodges v. Hodges 415 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gate City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. O'Connor 410 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gate City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. O'Connor 410 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mech v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 410 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1987
Mech v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 410 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1987