Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kindem, 313 N.W.2d 6.

745 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Lasheka Bolden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daron A-Saad Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Joseph Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Joseph Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daron A-Saad Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kabba Kangbateh 868 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kabba Kangbateh 868 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jack Arnold Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jack Arnold Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Francisco Cleofus Mountain Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bob Matt Jaschke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Holly Ann Eaton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Holly Ann Eaton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Francisco Cleofus Mountain Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[I]t would be a rare case which would warrant reversal of the refusal to depart.”
State of Minnesota v. Bob Matt Jaschke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joella Lee Tucker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joella Lee Tucker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Robert William Neft Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Robert William Neft Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We will reverse a district court’s imposition of a presumptive sentence only in a “rare case.” d 6, 7 (1981).
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We review a district court’s decision to grant or deny a departure from the presumptive sentence for abuse of discretion, and will reverse a presumptive sentence only in rare cases
State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Hope Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Hope Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Because the district court has broad discretion in sentencing, “we generally will not interfere with the exercise of that discretion.” (noting that it is a rare case wherein reversal of a refusal to depart from the CS-6 presumptive guidelines sentence is warranted because, even when substantial and compelling circumstances are present, the district court has discretion).
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Catherine Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Catherine Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(finding that defendant presented such a “rare” case and agreeing with this court that “the district court abused its discretion when it stayed [appellant’s] sentence”).
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[I]t would be a rare case which would warrant reversal of the refusal to depart.”
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Duane Gustafson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel David Ojanen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel David Ojanen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Duane Gustafson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Lee Goettig Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Lee Goettig Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court has “broad discretion” when considering a sentencing departure, and reversal of a refusal to depart is warranted only in “a rare case.”
State of Minnesota v. Nicole Leone Revello Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nicole Leone Revello Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jay Michael Ellingson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Anthony Engebretson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jay Michael Ellingson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[I]t would be a rare case which would warrant reversal of the refusal to depart.”
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Anthony Engebretson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Luke Mathias Erkkila Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Mikell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Luke Mathias Erkkila Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Mikell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Albert Joe Ryans, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Albert Joe Ryans, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court must order the presumptive sentence provided in the sentencing guidelines unless the case involves “substantial and compelling circumstances” to warrant a downward departure.1
State of Minnesota v. Kai Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014