Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights, 319 N.W.2d 702.

137 citing documents.

Ryan v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ryan v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Voss v. Duerscherl 408 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Voss v. Duerscherl 408 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
However, the application of collateral estoppel is appropriate only when, among other things, “there was a final judgment on the merits.” (emphasis added).
Wills v. Citizens State Bank of Silver Lake 399 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wills v. Citizens State Bank of Silver Lake 399 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Markert v. Behm 394 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Markert v. Behm 394 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*242 , 290 n. 2 (Minn.1985) ().
Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Tachtronic Instruments, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Tachtronic Instruments, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(giving collateral estoppel effect to a prior unlawful detainer action under a *167 “unique” fact situation in which the unlawful detainer action presented the parties a full and fair opportunity to litigate the particular issue).
Jordan v. Lamb 392 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Jordan v. Lamb 392 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Northfield National Bank v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 390 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Northfield National Bank v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 390 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
BOGENHOLM BY BOGENHOLM v. House 388 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
BOGENHOLM BY BOGENHOLM v. House 388 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(quoting Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. Weaver, 480 F.Supp.
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Coughlin v. Radosevich 372 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cook v. Connolly 366 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1985
Cook v. Connolly 366 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1985
quoting Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. Weaver, 480 F.Supp.
Roseberg v. Steen 363 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Roseberg v. Steen 363 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(quoting Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. Weaver, 480 F.Supp.
Cook v. Connolly 353 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cook v. Connolly 353 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
*186 The essential nature of this aspect of res judicata was recently stated with clarity in Ellis v. Minneapolis Comm’n on Civil Rights
Miller v. Northwestern National Insurance Co. 354 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Miller v. Northwestern National Insurance Co. 354 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ellis v. Minneapolis Com’n on Civil Rights
Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co. 353 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1984
Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co. 353 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1984
American Druggists Insurance v. Thompson Lumber Co. 349 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
American Druggists Insurance v. Thompson Lumber Co. 349 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Ellis v. Minneapolis Comm’n on Civil Rights, the Supreme Court articulated four factors necessary to invoke this doctrine: 1.
Boline v. Doty 345 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Boline v. Doty 345 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Ellis v. Minneapolis Comm’n on Civil Rights
City of Maplewood v. Kavanagh 333 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1983
City of Maplewood v. Kavanagh 333 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1983
See Staples v. Zinn, 302 Minn. 149, 152 , (res judicata); (collateral estoppel).
Willems v. Commissioner of Public Safety 333 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1983
Willems v. Commissioner of Public Safety 333 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1983