DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hernandez, 311 N.W.2d 478.

173 citing documents.

  • State v. Wittig 343 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Upon her subsequent plea of guilty to eight counts, with a zero criminal history score, she was sentenced consistent with the guidelines, using the Hernandez method — to 27 months in prison on counts seven and eight, concurrent with deferred probation of 30 years on the first six counts commencing after her prison term, and full restitution.
  • State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    The court should not have calculated defendant’s criminal history score under the Hernandez method, and simultaneously imposed consecutive sentences.
  • State v. Ott 341 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Ott 341 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1984
    Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, II.B.1.
  • State v. Moore 340 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Moore 340 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1983
    In computing defendant’s criminal history score, the trial court used the so-called Hernandez method — and Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary II.B.101 (1982) — giving defendant one point for the first count, two for the second count, etc., resulting in the maximum permissible criminal history score (six or more).
  • State v. Lalli 338 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Lalli 338 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Heywood 338 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Heywood 338 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1983
    (1982) —each was assigned one point for the second of two burglaries.
  • State v. Kirsch 338 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Kirsch 338 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Charest 336 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Charest 336 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 1983
    Moreover, the *307 trial court could have imposed a sentence much greater than the lenient sentence which was imposed, since the offenses were “separate and distinct offenses which were not part of a single behavioral incident or course of conduct and which did not involve the same victims * * *.” d at 481
  • State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Gartland 330 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Gartland 330 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Jones 328 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Jones 328 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1983
    and Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, II.B.101 (1982).
  • State v. Wilwert 317 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Wilwert 317 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1982
    Defendant’s criminal history score for the first was zero and — — for the second was two, one for the prior offense and one for committing it while awaiting sentencing.