Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Threinen, 328 N.W.2d 154.

56 citing documents.

State v. Brown 348 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1984
State v. Brown 348 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1984
See, (disapproving statement in closing argument that jury represents the people of the community and that the verdict would determine what kind of conduct would be tolerated on the streets); (disapproving of argument that suggested jury should keep the crime
Hanson v. State 345 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hanson v. State 345 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
A conviction based on circumstantial evidence can only be sustained when “the reasonable inferences from such evidence are consistent only with defendant’s guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of his guilt.” (citations omitted).
State v. Ngoc Van Vu 339 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1983
State v. Ngoc Van Vu 339 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1983
A conviction based on such evidence can only be sustained when “the reasonable inferences from such evidence are consistent only with defendant’s guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of his guilt.” ( et al.).