Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olson, 325 N.W.2d 13.

199 citing documents.

Baker v. Ploetz 616 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2000
State v. Prabhudail 602 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Clow 600 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Clow 600 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. Rader 597 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
“[Cjourts have no inherent authority to impose terms or conditions of sentence for criminal acts.” ().
State v. Sheppard 587 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Sheppard 587 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The Minnesota Supreme Court has established that courts “have no inherent authority to impose terms or conditions of sentence for criminal acts and that the power to prescribe punishment for such acts rests with the legislature.”
In Re Welfare of J.B.A. 581 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re Welfare of J.B.A. 581 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(imposing a sentence within the limits prescribed by the legislature properly lies with the judiciary).
State v. Royster 574 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Royster 574 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. McGrath 574 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. McGrath 574 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Worthy 569 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Worthy 569 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(adversarial system of justice requires that prosecutor alone cannot be charged with assessing whether mitigating factors exist in sentencing); State v. Williams, 297 Minn. 76 , 85 n. 8, , 26 n. 8 (1973) (“[Defense counsel is * * * one of the three major participants along with judge and
State v. Thoma 569 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Wagner 555 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Wagner 555 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Krotzer 548 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1996
State v. Krotzer 548 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.J.S. 539 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Welfare of L.J.S. 539 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(imposition of sentence within limits prescribed by legislature is purely a judicial function).
State v. Ford 539 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1995
State v. Ford 539 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1995
Whereas the power to define and to fix the punishment for crimes is vested in the legislature, “the imposition of the sentence within the limits prescribed by the legislature is purely a judicial function.” -18 (Minn. 1982).
State v. Krotzer 531 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Krotzer 531 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Vahabi 529 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Vahabi 529 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-18 (Minn.1982) (legislative function to define punishment for offenses).
State v. Johnson 514 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1994
State v. Johnson 514 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1994
As a matter of substantive law, the legislature has “[t]he power to define the conduct which constitutes a criminal offense and to fix the punishment for such conduct * * ⅜.” -18 (Minn.1982).
State v. Larson 473 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Larson 473 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(chaining the court’s power to the discretion of the prosecutor would violate the separation of powers doctrine and the constitution).
State ex rel. Mendota Heights Police Department v. Coley 453 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State ex rel. Mendota Heights Police Department v. Coley 453 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Brown 433 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Brown 433 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197, 200 , (construing Minn.Stat.
In Re the Investigation of the Death of VanSlooten 424 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Investigation of the Death of VanSlooten 424 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-21 (Minn.1980) (trial court does not have unlimited discretion to accept pleas to a lesser offense over the prosecutor’s opposition); (prose-cutorial approval cannot be a prerequisite to judicial decision not to sentence under mandatory minimum sentencing law).
State v. McKissic 415 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. McKissic 415 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
in which the court construed Minn.Stat.
In re the Miltona State Bank 414 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Miltona State Bank 414 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting Grudnosky v. Bislow, 251 Minn. 496, 498 , ).
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 400 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 400 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting Grudnosky v. Bislow, 251 Minn. 496, 498 , ).
State v. Lambert 392 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1986
State v. Lambert 392 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1986