Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hagen, 317 N.W.2d 701.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
riminal sexual conduct charge Hoagland was convicted of here, the supreme court stated that whether the defendant “used his relationship with the victim to facilitate the commission of the offense is one of the factors relied upon in determining the degree of the seriousness of a sex offense and which therefore should not be available for use in determining whether to depart.” 703 (Minn. 1982).
- Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
-
Taylor v. State
670 N.W.2d 584
Minn. 2003
( ); (explaining that court may not base dura-tional departure from presumptive sentence on evidence that defendant could have been convicted of uncharged offense); (
- State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State v. Christopherson
500 N.W.2d 794
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cf. Carpenter, d at 128 (probation officer and psychologist recommended executed sentence); -03 (Minn.1982) (defendant had history of deviant sexual conduct involving children and was diagnosed as poor candidate for treatment); (probation officer recommended against probation and defendant had prior history of treatment failure)
- State v. Schenk 427 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Schenk 427 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Dixon 415 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Dixon
415 N.W.2d 414
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nor should the court have relied on the need for “a sentence considering public protection and retribution.”
- State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Ture v. State 353 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1984
- Ture v. State 353 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1984
- State v. Case 350 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Case 350 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Ahern 349 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Ahern 349 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Hamilton 348 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Andren 347 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Hamilton 348 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Andren
347 N.W.2d 846
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see also State v. Chase at 697 (citing Hagen in the context of a Minn.Stat.
- State v. Northard 348 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Northard 348 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Hines 343 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Hines 343 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Chase 343 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Chase
343 N.W.2d 695
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
: * ⅜ * generally the victim’s vulnerability due to age cannot be relied upon as an aggravating factor when [as here] the victim’s vulnerability due to age has already been taken into account by the legislature in determining the elements of the offense.
- State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
- State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
- State v. Peterson 329 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1983
- Jackson v. State 329 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1983
- State v. Peterson 329 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1983
- Jackson v. State 329 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1983
- State v. Gardner 328 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1983
- State v. Magnan 328 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1983
- State v. Magnan 328 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1983
- State v. Gardner 328 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1983
- State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982
- State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982
- State v. Morales 324 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1982
- State v. Morales 324 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1982