DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Norton, 328 N.W.2d 142.

140 citing documents.

  • State v. Morris 609 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Smallwood 594 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Smallwood 594 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1999
    A determination of whether a departure is justified will be based on our “collective collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -06 (Minn.1993) (-47 (Minn.1982)).
  • State v. Spain 590 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Spain 590 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1999
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
    A determination whether “severe aggravating circumstances” exist justifying a greater-than-double durational departure (as opposed to “aggravating circumstances,” which warrant up to a double durational departure) “must be based on our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.”
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
    In the final analysis, determining whether severe aggravating circumstances are present “must be based on our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -47 (Minn.1982).
  • State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Murphy 545 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Murphy 545 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1996
    Whether severe aggravating circumstances are present is a decision which, “[i]n the final analysis * * ⅜ must be based on our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -47 (Minn.1982).
  • Perkins v. State 540 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Perkins v. State 540 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    Determining whether severe aggravating circumstances exist is a decision which “must be based on our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals.”
  • State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    In determining whether a case is one of the extremely rare cases warranting a greater than double departure, the court must rely on its “collective collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals.”
  • State v. Larson 520 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Larson 520 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    144 n. 1 (Minn.1982) (in “doubtful cases” in which the child victim has no idea in which county abuse occurred, the prosecutor may rely on section 627.15, in accord with Minn.R.Crim.P.
  • State v. Stirens 506 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Stirens 506 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1993
    We have said that when considering whether a sentence is proper we must base our decision on *306 “our collective collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -47 (Minn.1982).
  • State v. Poole 499 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
    We decide whether such circumstances exist by applying “our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.”
  • State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Poole 489 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Weaver 474 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Weaver 474 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Krejci 458 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Krejci 458 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1990
    144 n. 1 (Minn.1982), we pointed out to prosecutors the availability of section 627.15 when a child victim has no idea in which county abuse occurred.
  • State v. Hayes 456 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Hayes 456 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    In determining whether a case is one of the extremely rare cases warranting a greater than double departure, the court must rely on its “collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals[.]”
  • State v. Skinner 450 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Skinner 450 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1990
    Whether a given case is the “rare” case where the aggravating circumstances are so severe that a greater-than-double durational departure is justified is a decision which must be based on our “collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -47 (Minn.1982).
  • State v. Best 449 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Best 449 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1989
    This is something that ultimately we must decide based on our “collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of crimi *428 nal appeals.”
  • State v. Krejci 441 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Krejci 441 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Holmes v. State 437 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1989
  • Holmes v. State 437 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1989
    In the final analysis, our decision whether a particular dura-tional departure by a trial judge was justified “must be based on our collective, colle-giaR experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -47 (Minn.1982).
  • State v. Glaraton 425 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Glaraton 425 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1988
    Whether severe aggravating circumstances are present is a decision which, “[i]n the final analysis * * * must be based on our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -47 (Minn.1983).
  • State v. Fields 423 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Fields 423 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1988
    In the final analysis, our decision of such an issue “must be based on our collective, collegial experience in reviewing a large number of criminal appeals from all the judicial districts.” -47 (Minn.1982).
  • State v. Strommen 411 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Strommen 411 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    victim was particularly vulnerable due to her age (66) and where defendant acted with particular cruelty — injury of a *544 serious and permanent nature inflicted, where victim was forced to submit to multiple forms of sexual penetration; defendant invaded the zone of privacy surrounding and including the victim’s home; defendant dragged victim outside which heightened her fear); (triple the presumptive sentence where victim was particularly vulnerable due to age (5) and where defendant acted wi