Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bentley, 329 N.W.2d 39.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(granting jail credit for time in custody in Minnesota on unrelated charges) , (noting that defendant is not entitled to jail credit for time in custody in North 6 Dakota on non-Minnesota charges).
State v. Roy 928 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2019
Simeon Leon Brooks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Simeon Leon Brooks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 778; (stating that “defendant is not entitled to credit for time spent in prison in North Dakota before he was paroled to Minnesota authorities”).
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 428–29 (quotation omitted); (stating that a defendant receives no jail credit for time spent in prison in another state before being paroled to and jailed in Minnesota for Minnesota charges); (sustaining district court ruling that jail credit is allowed for time spent in
State of Minnesota v. Armando Jesus Pedraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Armando Jesus Pedraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Parr 414 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Parr 414 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(no jail credit for time spent in prison in another state before being paroled to and jailed in Minnesota for trial on Minnesota charges).
State Ex Rel. Linehan v. Wood 397 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1986
State Ex Rel. Linehan v. Wood 397 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1986
The trial court denied the petition
State v. Willis 376 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1985
State v. Willis 376 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1985
State v. Mattson 356 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Mattson 356 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Brown 348 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1984
State v. Brown 348 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1984
4(B), provides automatic credit for “all time spent in custody in connection with the offense or behavioral incident for which sentence is imposed * * The state concedes that under the rule and under decisions of this court interpreting it — see, — defendant is entitled to credit for time spent in jail in' Minnesota awaiting trial.
State v. Kinsky 348 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1984
State v. Kinsky 348 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1984
“[A] sentencing court may stay execution of a presumptively executed sentence if the facts indicate that the defendant is particularly amenable to treatment in a probationary setting.”
State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Deschampe 332 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1983
State v. Deschampe 332 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1983
Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, III.C.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by